<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Webbslingin&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 03:17:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-168155</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 01:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-168155</guid>
		<description>Markm, are you sure FOPA wouldn&#039;t apply?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Markm, are you sure FOPA wouldn&#8217;t apply?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-168137</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-168137</guid>
		<description>It happened on Capitol Hill, but until teleporters are invented, you can&#039;t get from Virginia to Capital Hill without going through DC. So, unless they got a police officer to transport it to the Hill, every staffer and Congressman with a gun there broke the law at some point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It happened on Capitol Hill, but until teleporters are invented, you can&#8217;t get from Virginia to Capital Hill without going through DC. So, unless they got a police officer to transport it to the Hill, every staffer and Congressman with a gun there broke the law at some point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-168052</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-168052</guid>
		<description>SU: the arrest happened on Capitol Hill, which AFAIK is subject to its own rules, not DC ordinances - again, unless Congress is retarded, a possibility I can&#039;t rule out.  In any event, I&#039;m not aware of any evidence that &lt;i&gt;Webb&#039;s&lt;/i&gt; involvement in the incident happened in DC.  And no, you don&#039;t have to be a Senator&#039;s aide (the Senator himself wasn&#039;t there, remember?) for cops and prosecutors to exercise discretion and cut you some slack if your violation was unintentional.

Robb: I&#039;ll grant you that the exact quote was ambiguous on that point, but Webb&#039;s general position on gun rights is not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SU: the arrest happened on Capitol Hill, which AFAIK is subject to its own rules, not DC ordinances &#8211; again, unless Congress is retarded, a possibility I can&#8217;t rule out.  In any event, I&#8217;m not aware of any evidence that <i>Webb&#8217;s</i> involvement in the incident happened in DC.  And no, you don&#8217;t have to be a Senator&#8217;s aide (the Senator himself wasn&#8217;t there, remember?) for cops and prosecutors to exercise discretion and cut you some slack if your violation was unintentional.</p>
<p>Robb: I&#8217;ll grant you that the exact quote was ambiguous on that point, but Webb&#8217;s general position on gun rights is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robb Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-168049</link>
		<dc:creator>Robb Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 00:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-168049</guid>
		<description>XLRQ, I cannot remember the exact quote but he said &quot;People in my position deserve to protect themselves&quot;. I read that as &quot;FOR ME! NOT FOR THEE!&quot;, but YMMV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XLRQ, I cannot remember the exact quote but he said &#8220;People in my position deserve to protect themselves&#8221;. I read that as &#8220;FOR ME! NOT FOR THEE!&#8221;, but YMMV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167990</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 12:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167990</guid>
		<description>Xrlq, the incident occurred in DC.  I don&#039;t think &#039;oops, i meant to leave it in virginia&#039; is a valid defense.  unless you&#039;re a senator, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xrlq, the incident occurred in DC.  I don&#8217;t think &#8216;oops, i meant to leave it in virginia&#8217; is a valid defense.  unless you&#8217;re a senator, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nylarthotep</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167989</link>
		<dc:creator>Nylarthotep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167989</guid>
		<description>Webb pegged the Jerk meter on this one. How is it that he left a gun in a vehicle that was no longer in his control? How is it he failed to tell his aide that the gun was there? This jerk is completely irresponsible. 

As for Thompson, the aide, how is it he wasn&#039;t smart enough to check a bag he was carrying into a security area? Personally, I&#039;ve worked in security areas and you always check what you are carrying. It prevents people from pointing guns at you and putting you in jail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webb pegged the Jerk meter on this one. How is it that he left a gun in a vehicle that was no longer in his control? How is it he failed to tell his aide that the gun was there? This jerk is completely irresponsible. </p>
<p>As for Thompson, the aide, how is it he wasn&#8217;t smart enough to check a bag he was carrying into a security area? Personally, I&#8217;ve worked in security areas and you always check what you are carrying. It prevents people from pointing guns at you and putting you in jail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167988</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167988</guid>
		<description>Uncle: your reference to &quot;other&quot; D.C. residents implies that Webb resides in D.C..  Do you have any evidence that he does? From what I gather, it appears entirely plausible that the mix-up happened in Virginia, and the gun was never meant to reach D.C.  Not that D.C. laws apply on Capitol Hill anyway - Congress is retarded if they do.

Straightarrow: I have no idea where you get the idea Webb thinks other citizens shouldn&#039;t have the same right to defend themselves that he does.  Did you just make that up out of whole cloth?

Bruce: You say &quot;no special treatment&quot; but I suspect you mean the opposite.  The guy spent a night in jail and now faces felony charges for what by all accounts was an innocent, harmless error.  That &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; special treatment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uncle: your reference to &#8220;other&#8221; D.C. residents implies that Webb resides in D.C..  Do you have any evidence that he does? From what I gather, it appears entirely plausible that the mix-up happened in Virginia, and the gun was never meant to reach D.C.  Not that D.C. laws apply on Capitol Hill anyway &#8211; Congress is retarded if they do.</p>
<p>Straightarrow: I have no idea where you get the idea Webb thinks other citizens shouldn&#8217;t have the same right to defend themselves that he does.  Did you just make that up out of whole cloth?</p>
<p>Bruce: You say &#8220;no special treatment&#8221; but I suspect you mean the opposite.  The guy spent a night in jail and now faces felony charges for what by all accounts was an innocent, harmless error.  That <i>is</i> special treatment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreedomSight &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Well, I&#8217;ve let a week go by</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167982</link>
		<dc:creator>FreedomSight &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Well, I&#8217;ve let a week go by</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167982</guid>
		<description>[...] Say Uncle is asking the sort of question about the Webb gun thing that I would, if I were, uh, which I am, except I&#8217;m not writing them down. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Say Uncle is asking the sort of question about the Webb gun thing that I would, if I were, uh, which I am, except I&#8217;m not writing them down. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167979</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167979</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going with the response I had for Zumbo.

F*** him.

That said...

Throw the book at him. No mercy.

Don&#039;t like the law? CHANGE IT!

No special treatment. No mulligans. No forgiveness.

As someone said on another site I read recently: My giveadamn&#039;s broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going with the response I had for Zumbo.</p>
<p>F*** him.</p>
<p>That said&#8230;</p>
<p>Throw the book at him. No mercy.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t like the law? CHANGE IT!</p>
<p>No special treatment. No mulligans. No forgiveness.</p>
<p>As someone said on another site I read recently: My giveadamn&#8217;s broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167973</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 22:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167973</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t Senator Webb special?  He desires to protect himself and his family. Nobody else ever had that desire, er, uh, I mean, uh, er, .... nobody that counts.

Thank you Senator Webb for your statement as to your opinion of the status of your fellow, though less exalted, citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t Senator Webb special?  He desires to protect himself and his family. Nobody else ever had that desire, er, uh, I mean, uh, er, &#8230;. nobody that counts.</p>
<p>Thank you Senator Webb for your statement as to your opinion of the status of your fellow, though less exalted, citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167971</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167971</guid>
		<description>I dunno, Webb&#039;s comments make it seem as if a staffer is about to be thrown to the sharks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, Webb&#8217;s comments make it seem as if a staffer is about to be thrown to the sharks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeorgeH</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167967</link>
		<dc:creator>GeorgeH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167967</guid>
		<description>I am confident that there will be some failure by the Capitol Police to document the chain of custody or something resulting in dismissal of the charges. The head of the hill cops knows who is going to write the bill for their next raise. There is no way they will risk alienating the staffers by prosecuting one of them of following orders.

Out of curiosity, looking for a way around the DC Gun Law, I reread &lt;em&gt;H.R.218: The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004&lt;/em&gt; that permits police officers to concealed carry &#039;anywhere&#039;. Make that anywhere in any of the states or their subdivisions. The act seems not to apply to the District.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confident that there will be some failure by the Capitol Police to document the chain of custody or something resulting in dismissal of the charges. The head of the hill cops knows who is going to write the bill for their next raise. There is no way they will risk alienating the staffers by prosecuting one of them of following orders.</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, looking for a way around the DC Gun Law, I reread <em>H.R.218: The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004</em> that permits police officers to concealed carry &#8216;anywhere&#8217;. Make that anywhere in any of the states or their subdivisions. The act seems not to apply to the District.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Montag</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167964</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Montag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167964</guid>
		<description>I must have been remembering the former IRS guy incorrectly, or he might have been making up a tall tale and I fell for it.

&lt;i&gt;For what it’s worth, he was not charged with possessing an unregistered gun and ammo. The DC District Attorney only filed charges against unlawful concealment. 

My guess is that’s the only one they can get to stick.&lt;/i&gt;

So he gets out of the machine gun charge too? DAMN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must have been remembering the former IRS guy incorrectly, or he might have been making up a tall tale and I fell for it.</p>
<p><i>For what it’s worth, he was not charged with possessing an unregistered gun and ammo. The DC District Attorney only filed charges against unlawful concealment. </p>
<p>My guess is that’s the only one they can get to stick.</i></p>
<p>So he gets out of the machine gun charge too? DAMN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravenwood</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167962</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravenwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167962</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, he was not charged with possessing an unregistered gun and ammo.  The DC District Attorney only filed charges against unlawful concealment.  

My guess is that&#039;s the only one they can get to stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, he was not charged with possessing an unregistered gun and ammo.  The DC District Attorney only filed charges against unlawful concealment.  </p>
<p>My guess is that&#8217;s the only one they can get to stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Countertop</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167959</link>
		<dc:creator>Countertop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167959</guid>
		<description>This makes more sense, as I posted at Kim&#039;s, since I know lots of hill staffers with guns (mostly in their cars).

Regarding guy&#039;s comment on the IRS agent - DC has on jurisidictio over a federal officer.  WHich is more or less the case here - DC law is about 5 rungs down on the ladder for federal employees in the course of their job.  But for the attention this has recieve, I would have expected this to disappear pretty quick.

In fact, it probably still will disappear because DC has no jurisidcation on Capitol Hill (or indeed, anywhere in DC in the face of the federal government).


If Capitol POlice have it, it will probably be returned.  If not, who knows (though I am SHOCKED, SHOCKED that he was turned over to DC police - I suspect it happened prior to senior officials getting wind of whats going on.  Capitol POlice are 100% political. WOuldn&#039;t be surprised if someone lost their job over this.)

Yes, each round is a seperate violation.  Haven&#039;t looked at the law recently, but my recollection is each round also carried a seperate jail term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes more sense, as I posted at Kim&#8217;s, since I know lots of hill staffers with guns (mostly in their cars).</p>
<p>Regarding guy&#8217;s comment on the IRS agent &#8211; DC has on jurisidictio over a federal officer.  WHich is more or less the case here &#8211; DC law is about 5 rungs down on the ladder for federal employees in the course of their job.  But for the attention this has recieve, I would have expected this to disappear pretty quick.</p>
<p>In fact, it probably still will disappear because DC has no jurisidcation on Capitol Hill (or indeed, anywhere in DC in the face of the federal government).</p>
<p>If Capitol POlice have it, it will probably be returned.  If not, who knows (though I am SHOCKED, SHOCKED that he was turned over to DC police &#8211; I suspect it happened prior to senior officials getting wind of whats going on.  Capitol POlice are 100% political. WOuldn&#8217;t be surprised if someone lost their job over this.)</p>
<p>Yes, each round is a seperate violation.  Haven&#8217;t looked at the law recently, but my recollection is each round also carried a seperate jail term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167958</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167958</guid>
		<description>((former Hill employee with friends among Members and staff still there -- if you publish this, please do not use my real name))

The reference to &quot;members and staff&quot; being allowed to bring guns into the Capitol almost certainly applies only to weapons actually owned by Senators and Representations.  During my time in DC there were no shortage of anecdotes about staff members with the misfortune to be searched while returning their boss&#039;s car to a Capitol garage.  Once it was determined that the official owned the weapon, the issue went away.

No matter what the rules re: weapons in the Capitol complex,  the minute that weapon  crosses into DC, a law is broken.  

As for the Capitol Police filing charges based on DC law, they have full authority to enforce local laws in their area of responsbility, essentially the Capitol complex and the surrounding area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>((former Hill employee with friends among Members and staff still there &#8212; if you publish this, please do not use my real name))</p>
<p>The reference to &#8220;members and staff&#8221; being allowed to bring guns into the Capitol almost certainly applies only to weapons actually owned by Senators and Representations.  During my time in DC there were no shortage of anecdotes about staff members with the misfortune to be searched while returning their boss&#8217;s car to a Capitol garage.  Once it was determined that the official owned the weapon, the issue went away.</p>
<p>No matter what the rules re: weapons in the Capitol complex,  the minute that weapon  crosses into DC, a law is broken.  </p>
<p>As for the Capitol Police filing charges based on DC law, they have full authority to enforce local laws in their area of responsbility, essentially the Capitol complex and the surrounding area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CTD</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167955</link>
		<dc:creator>CTD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167955</guid>
		<description>As always, one set of rules for &lt;i&gt;them&lt;/i&gt;, and another one for us peasants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, one set of rules for <i>them</i>, and another one for us peasants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snowflakes in Hell &#187; The Tangled Webb</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167952</link>
		<dc:creator>Snowflakes in Hell &#187; The Tangled Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 19:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167952</guid>
		<description>[...] Webb stuff is getting interesting just as I have to concentrate on stuff at work.Â  Instapundit and SayUncle are on top of it.Â  I agree that Webb should get on the repeal DC gun ban issue pronto.Â  Some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Webb stuff is getting interesting just as I have to concentrate on stuff at work.Â  Instapundit and SayUncle are on top of it.Â  I agree that Webb should get on the repeal DC gun ban issue pronto.Â  Some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Montag</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167947</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Montag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167947</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Is each round of unregistered ammo a separate violation?&lt;/i&gt;

Last I heard, &#039;undocumented&#039; ammo is fined at $500/round.

Thanks for the link!  Got tipped to the machinegun thingie from one of your commentors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Is each round of unregistered ammo a separate violation?</i></p>
<p>Last I heard, &#8216;undocumented&#8217; ammo is fined at $500/round.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link!  Got tipped to the machinegun thingie from one of your commentors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Montag</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/27/webbslingin/comment-page-1/#comment-167945</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Montag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 18:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/27/webbslingin/#comment-167945</guid>
		<description>Um, Uncle, they might be illegal &quot;off school grounds&quot; but can still be legal &quot;on school grounds&quot;.

This whole story is getting really odd now, with the inclusion that employees of members may bring guns into Congressional spaces.  Seems he violated the unloaded rule (if that one is accurate) but I am not seeing how he would be charged with unlicensed ammo by the Capitol police since that sounds like a DC charge.

I believe the following is completly unrelated, but a former IRS security officer (sorry) told me that they got special carry permits from DC if part of their coverage area forced them to leave IRS space.  I think they came under the &quot;cop&quot; category or something.

Looking forward for your sifting through all of this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Uncle, they might be illegal &#8220;off school grounds&#8221; but can still be legal &#8220;on school grounds&#8221;.</p>
<p>This whole story is getting really odd now, with the inclusion that employees of members may bring guns into Congressional spaces.  Seems he violated the unloaded rule (if that one is accurate) but I am not seeing how he would be charged with unlicensed ammo by the Capitol police since that sounds like a DC charge.</p>
<p>I believe the following is completly unrelated, but a former IRS security officer (sorry) told me that they got special carry permits from DC if part of their coverage area forced them to leave IRS space.  I think they came under the &#8220;cop&#8221; category or something.</p>
<p>Looking forward for your sifting through all of this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
