Comments on: Fred who?

By: dave

dave — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:33:29 +0000

To quote the awesome Frank J. at http://www.imao.us:

* The actual cause of global warming: Fred Thompson’s burning rage.

By: Kevin Baker

Kevin Baker — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 02:02:42 +0000

Dammit. Try again: Why settle for the lesser evil?

By: Kevin Baker

Kevin Baker — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 02:01:13 +0000

The time has come to stop settling for the lesser of two evils and start aiming for what we really want. – KC Steve

Why settle for the lesser evil?

By: anonymous

anonymous — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 01:48:41 +0000

To hijack this thread: Ron Paul just announced he’s running for president.

I for one want to welcome our new lizard queen overlord!

By: KCSteve

KCSteve — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 23:17:39 +0000

I’m not going to waste my vote in any more election cycles. If there isn’t a ‘mainstream’ candidate that I can actually support (rather than tolerate) I’ll vote for whatever candidate comes closest to agreeing with my views, no matter how ‘minor’ their party may be.

The time has come to stop settling for the lesser of two evils and start aiming for what we really want.

So far everything I’ve seen on Thompson says he’s someone I would vote for.

By: Nashville is Talking » Fred Freakin’ Thompson!: A Round-Up

Nashville is Talking » Fred Freakin’ Thompson!: A Round-Up — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:28:45 +0000

[...] SayUncle: I share Tam’s sentiment: Fred Thompson, former Senator from TN, is no libertarian, but compared to McCain or Giuliani (or Dubya, for that matter) he looks like Ronald Reagan. Pro-trade, pro-business, fairly hawkish, and socially conservative; if you liked the Eighties GOP, presumably you could vote for Fred and get seconds. [...]

By: Ron W

Ron W — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:09:01 +0000

Thompson is better than any of the other big names in both major parties. but I would not vote for him unless he’s opposed to globalism, that is would he stop the invasion of our country, amnesty and accommodation of illegal immigration and handing over our trade decisions to international tribunals (NAFTA, CAFTA and FTAA) so other countries (the global economy) can benefit from our massive trade defiicts. Otherwise he SAYS he’s for gun rights which is good, but so did Bush, and he supported the Clinton AWB and will support it again IF the Nazi-Commie tyrants in Congress have their way.

And like anonymous says, “Thompson voted for McCain-Feingold. That�s not cool.” Yes, that was an attack on the First Amendment to keep the big money in the hands of the two party establishments and the big media corporations. Can’t be having it spread around…they want it all; along with the power and control.

By: anonymous

anonymous — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:37:04 +0000

Thompson voted for McCain-Feingold. That’s not cool.

By: Rustmeister

Rustmeister — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:00:49 +0000

Same here.

By: Kevin Baker

Kevin Baker — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:54:45 +0000

Honest to pete, I can’t see myself voting for anybody running right now on the side of the ‘Publicans.

Thompson I could vote for.

By: #9

#9 — Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:52:10 +0000

Hope Fred does run. My current candidate Bill Richardson doesn’t stand a chance. It would be great to be able to cast a real vote instead of a defensive vote or a protest vote. I can understand people being excited and enthusiastic about a Ronald Reagan type candidate.