Comments on: At least the ninth circuit is consistent http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/06/at_least_the_ninth_circuit_is_consistent/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:27:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: 2nd Amendment Blogburst at Traction Control http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/06/at_least_the_ninth_circuit_is_consistent/comment-page-1/#comment-167115 2nd Amendment Blogburst at Traction Control Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:46:32 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/06/at_least_the_ninth_circuit_is_consistent/#comment-167115 [...] At least the ninth circuit is consistent [...] [...] At least the ninth circuit is consistent [...]

]]> By: straightarrow http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/06/at_least_the_ninth_circuit_is_consistent/comment-page-1/#comment-166742 straightarrow Thu, 08 Mar 2007 04:00:34 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/06/at_least_the_ninth_circuit_is_consistent/#comment-166742 Nescio, if that be so, then the other side of this issue has no right to express their views, either. That obvioulsy is not the case. The court has done again what it has no right or legitimate power to do. It has advocated for a party before it, rather than render impartially an opinion based on law. Nescio, if that be so, then the other side of this issue has no right to express their views, either. That obvioulsy is not the case. The court has done again what it has no right or legitimate power to do. It has advocated for a party before it, rather than render impartially an opinion based on law.

]]> By: Nomen Nescio http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/06/at_least_the_ninth_circuit_is_consistent/comment-page-1/#comment-166608 Nomen Nescio Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:57:59 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/06/at_least_the_ninth_circuit_is_consistent/#comment-166608 seems perfectly consistent with established precedents --- minors have effectively no rights, particularly not when at school. no, i don't like it either, but it <b>does</b> jive well with <i>stare decisis</i> and with previous case law. none of the three would be the case were i dictator, but i'm not. seems perfectly consistent with established precedents — minors have effectively no rights, particularly not when at school.

no, i don’t like it either, but it does jive well with stare decisis and with previous case law. none of the three would be the case were i dictator, but i’m not.

]]> By: Random Nuclear Strikes » Step Quick http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/03/06/at_least_the_ninth_circuit_is_consistent/comment-page-1/#comment-166606 Random Nuclear Strikes » Step Quick Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:50:42 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/03/06/at_least_the_ninth_circuit_is_consistent/#comment-166606 [...] Eugene Volokh (via Uncle)comes word that the 9th Circuit Federal Court has ruled that wearing a shirt with a printed message [...] [...] Eugene Volokh (via Uncle)comes word that the 9th Circuit Federal Court has ruled that wearing a shirt with a printed message [...]

]]>