Comments on: Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:12:19 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: 2nd Amendment Blogburst at Traction Control http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/comment-page-1/#comment-167114 2nd Amendment Blogburst at Traction Control Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:39:39 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/#comment-167114 [...] Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act [...] [...] Tennessee Firearms Freedom Act [...]

]]> By: Bumper Guy! http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/comment-page-1/#comment-166324 Bumper Guy! Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:53:50 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/#comment-166324 Let me see now . . . this thing has a trigger (firing mechanism), a barrel, a stock/grip and it fires projectiles . . . so it is called a "gun" which includes everything from a missile launcher to a BB gun, be it a pistol, revolver or rifle. It could be mounted on an airplane, tank, water vessel or inside your pocket. The gun banners only focus on "civilian" weapons. But it is perfectly OK for these same gun banners to sanction weapons of mass destruction! Why? They are either stupid civilians or idealogs who want your freedom on a silver platter! Americans - Beware of BOTH! Let me see now . . . this thing has a trigger (firing mechanism), a barrel, a stock/grip and it fires projectiles . . . so it is called a “gun” which includes everything from a missile launcher to a BB gun, be it a pistol, revolver or rifle. It could be mounted on an airplane, tank, water vessel or inside your pocket.

The gun banners only focus on “civilian” weapons. But it is perfectly OK for these same gun banners to sanction weapons of mass destruction! Why? They are either stupid civilians or idealogs who want your freedom on a silver platter!

Americans – Beware of BOTH!

]]> By: Standard Mischief http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/comment-page-1/#comment-166237 Standard Mischief Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:55:59 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/#comment-166237 <blockquote>Update: If it passes, seems to me that one could go in the firearm business without all the red tape currently required by the feds.</blockquote> You mean exactly like one could set up shop in California to grow and dispense medical marijuana, right? I'm pretty sure that the <strike>DEA</strike>, err I mean BATFE would likely just totally leave you alone then, right?

Update: If it passes, seems to me that one could go in the firearm business without all the red tape currently required by the feds.

You mean exactly like one could set up shop in California to grow and dispense medical marijuana, right?

I’m pretty sure that the DEA, err I mean BATFE would likely just totally leave you alone then, right?

]]> By: robert http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/comment-page-1/#comment-166218 robert Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:34:54 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/#comment-166218 That's a dang nice bill.....but sure gets tiresome to have to remind the feds of their proper role. I'd sure rather try and coax them back into their Constitutional restraints with bills like this than any other way. That’s a dang nice bill…..but sure gets tiresome to have to remind the feds of their proper role.

I’d sure rather try and coax them back into their Constitutional restraints with bills like this than any other way.

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/comment-page-1/#comment-166189 Sebastian Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:20:39 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/#comment-166189 It's a nice symbolic gesture, but it won't overcome the supremacy clause in court. Still, I think stuff like this helps though, because it shows the courts that states are getting tired of this stuff. It’s a nice symbolic gesture, but it won’t overcome the supremacy clause in court. Still, I think stuff like this helps though, because it shows the courts that states are getting tired of this stuff.

]]> By: markm http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/comment-page-1/#comment-166187 markm Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:09:06 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/02/28/tennessee_firearms_freedom_act/#comment-166187 It might be more about federalism than about firearms - that is, this bill could just be the setup for a case that will require the supreme court to take another look at the limits of the interstate commerce clause. Not that this will do anything to clear up the horrible muddle that already exists - since they've already ruled that there are limits to the ICC where guns are concerned, but none where marijuana is concerned... It might be more about federalism than about firearms – that is, this bill could just be the setup for a case that will require the supreme court to take another look at the limits of the interstate commerce clause. Not that this will do anything to clear up the horrible muddle that already exists – since they’ve already ruled that there are limits to the ICC where guns are concerned, but none where marijuana is concerned…

]]>