Ammo For Sale

« « Fire Mission | Home | Those legs » »

One more thing on that thing I’m no longer blogging about

Remember, gun nuts, we’re the ones that are paranoid. Not them.

And Mike Faulk says Opposition Doesn’t Mean Annihilation:

Ironically, those attacking Zumbo the hardest give the anti-gun crowd plenty of cannon fodder. It’s a shame. Surely his lifetime of advocacy for that which most gun owners hold dear, the right to bear arms, should count for something. The big picture of Zumbo’s career promoting the Second Amendment should overwhelm a mistake of expressing an unpopular opinion in a less than artful way.

Yup. We are too quick to pull the trigger some times.

4 Responses to “One more thing on that thing I’m no longer blogging about”

  1. Unix-Jedi Says:

    Surely his lifetime of advocacy for that which most gun owners hold dear, the right to bear arms, should count for something.

    *sigh*

    Can somebody hook this horse up to an EEG?

    His supposed lifetime of advocacy, which apparently meant “sporting use” to him. That should count for something – that he should know far better than to toss those EBRs to the gun-grabbers again.

    Hell, in his first post, he said he was informed that they were “tackdrivers”. He’s a hunter. He knows the round is a varmit round. He now knows they’re tackdriving accuracy, and the use is spreading like wildfire.

    So he posts that they should be outlawed. That is the offense he’s committed. His past has been taken into consideration by most everybody I know who’s been outraged!

    His past actions? What have they been? I really don’t know – his self-defence merely said he’d been an NRA member for 40 years.

    This isn’t someone who’s been notable in the gun-rights world – I’d never heard of him – but was notable in the hunting world. And, by his own admission now, he was willing to ban those EBRs, again.

    I really can’t see that as being “too fast on the trigger”.

  2. Kevin Baker Says:

    Tam, once again, says it perfectly: “they’ve been playing on astroturf so long that they don’t know grassroots even when fed a mouthful of divot.”

    Nope – it’s always the eeeeevil NRA.

    Actually, I view this as a good opportunity to start showing people who think “hunting prairie dogs with an assault rifle” means “blasting them with a machine-gun” how they’ve been mislead by the anti-gun forces and the media. I’ve done a good bit of that recently, touring the blogosphere and commenting where that function is available.

    I recommed it for all gunbloggers. You know better – explain why they’re full of it. Politely.

  3. existingthing Says:

    “Surely his lifetime of advocacy for that which most gun owners hold dear, the right to bear arms”

    Err… As I recall, he called owners of certain guns terrorists, and referred to the guns themselves as “terrorist guns”… I think that’s pretty much the same as saying they should be banned.

  4. david elliott Says:

    Read the state’s contatution’s like maines “The right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE QUESTIONED”
    That meens you shouldn’t do anything but support that right or stop being an AMERICAN….go back to england where the crown has took all arms and are working at toys and bb guns.They want to kill the “gun culture”
    What your really saying is you want to promote a “culture of defenselessness”” a culture of crimanials””tyrants”
    and an army that no longer knows how to shoot! Most snipers are good old hunting boys.I’ve trained city/cartoon kids they are dangously stupid with guns coz you liberals don’t teach your kids real world skillz.Now I can’t type more.I have a real job other than preaching anti-revolutionary slogans like ONLY the king should have arms? and guns are bad?Yah so Hitler was right gun control works. Against stupid people. Like you.

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives