<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They do exist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:47:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/comment-page-1/#comment-160972</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 22:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/#comment-160972</guid>
		<description>Trainer:

Caliber.  That&#039;s what&#039;s missing.
Ken is right about shooting at clouds, but remember the .30 carbine?  I am jsut not sold on the .223 but maybe I&#039;m all wet.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trainer:</p>
<p>Caliber.  That&#8217;s what&#8217;s missing.<br />
Ken is right about shooting at clouds, but remember the .30 carbine?  I am jsut not sold on the .223 but maybe I&#8217;m all wet.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trainer</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/comment-page-1/#comment-160971</link>
		<dc:creator>trainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/#comment-160971</guid>
		<description>Maybe it was the lack of sights, the smoking forend, or the question of who can freakin&#039; afford a full-auto now-a-days...but I was strangely not impressed.

I don&#039;t know why but something is missing from this thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it was the lack of sights, the smoking forend, or the question of who can freakin&#8217; afford a full-auto now-a-days&#8230;but I was strangely not impressed.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why but something is missing from this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USCitizen</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/comment-page-1/#comment-160944</link>
		<dc:creator>USCitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/#comment-160944</guid>
		<description>Nice vid, but I noticed that they failed to exhibit the classic Say Uncle stance!   Heh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice vid, but I noticed that they failed to exhibit the classic Say Uncle stance!   Heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/comment-page-1/#comment-160881</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/#comment-160881</guid>
		<description>Yeah they are around. I once saw one of these belt feed M-16s in the armor at Fort McClellan. But never seen one in action. Pretty cool but would rather have a M249 SAW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah they are around. I once saw one of these belt feed M-16s in the armor at Fort McClellan. But never seen one in action. Pretty cool but would rather have a M249 SAW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/comment-page-1/#comment-160880</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 22:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/#comment-160880</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget, muzzle control is the issue. What good is a larger, heavier cartridge if the
only thing you&#039;re going to hit is a cloud?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget, muzzle control is the issue. What good is a larger, heavier cartridge if the<br />
only thing you&#8217;re going to hit is a cloud?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/comment-page-1/#comment-160877</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/12/29/they_do_exist/#comment-160877</guid>
		<description>Well yeah.
Peace through superior firepower.  Does it come in something other than .223???  Maybe some of the more experienced gunners can give me some insight:  Is the .223 a capable enough round with the carbine-length barrel?  Intuition tells me there is more energy needed to be effective, even when belt-fed and full-auto.
Great video.

Dan Patterson
Arrogant Infidel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yeah.<br />
Peace through superior firepower.  Does it come in something other than .223???  Maybe some of the more experienced gunners can give me some insight:  Is the .223 a capable enough round with the carbine-length barrel?  Intuition tells me there is more energy needed to be effective, even when belt-fed and full-auto.<br />
Great video.</p>
<p>Dan Patterson<br />
Arrogant Infidel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

