<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Helmke Media Push</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/22/the_helmke_media_push/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/22/the_helmke_media_push/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:20:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: countertop</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/22/the_helmke_media_push/comment-page-1/#comment-159075</link>
		<dc:creator>countertop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/12/22/the_helmke_media_push/#comment-159075</guid>
		<description>Will do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/22/the_helmke_media_push/comment-page-1/#comment-159074</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/12/22/the_helmke_media_push/#comment-159074</guid>
		<description>From a comment over there:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Assault Weapons Ban. This is one I don&#039;t agree with. I have an AR-15 &quot;Clinton ban&quot; model. The only difference between pre ban and &quot;Clinton ban&quot; rifles is simply cosmetic. My &quot;Clinton ban&quot; rifle does not have a flash surpressor and bayonette lug. Beyond that, my &quot;Clinton ban&quot; rifle is just as capable of creating just as much destruction and fireing just as many rounds as any pre ban AR-15. If you want to have an effect, go after high capacity magazine clips. This is what does the damage. No hunter needs a 30 round clip for his AR-15.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Seriously, maybe I&#039;m just more of a radical than I think, but people like this really piss me off.  I don&#039;t have to justify why I need a 30 round magazine... that&#039;s the magazine that is meant to go with the damned rifle, so he can seriously kiss my ass.  We are our own worst enemies, I&#039;m telling you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a comment over there:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Assault Weapons Ban. This is one I don&#8217;t agree with. I have an AR-15 &#8220;Clinton ban&#8221; model. The only difference between pre ban and &#8220;Clinton ban&#8221; rifles is simply cosmetic. My &#8220;Clinton ban&#8221; rifle does not have a flash surpressor and bayonette lug. Beyond that, my &#8220;Clinton ban&#8221; rifle is just as capable of creating just as much destruction and fireing just as many rounds as any pre ban AR-15. If you want to have an effect, go after high capacity magazine clips. This is what does the damage. No hunter needs a 30 round clip for his AR-15.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Seriously, maybe I&#8217;m just more of a radical than I think, but people like this really piss me off.  I don&#8217;t have to justify why I need a 30 round magazine&#8230; that&#8217;s the magazine that is meant to go with the damned rifle, so he can seriously kiss my ass.  We are our own worst enemies, I&#8217;m telling you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fun Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/12/22/the_helmke_media_push/comment-page-1/#comment-159003</link>
		<dc:creator>Fun Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/12/22/the_helmke_media_push/#comment-159003</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Federal background checks have been weakened? How is that? News to me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

My best guess is he is referring to NICS records retention.  They don&#039;t like instant background checks truly being &#039;instant&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Federal background checks have been weakened? How is that? News to me.</p></blockquote>
<p>My best guess is he is referring to NICS records retention.  They don&#8217;t like instant background checks truly being &#8216;instant&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
