Comments on: Anti-gunner comments making the rounds

By: Heartless Libertarian

Heartless Libertarian — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:11:03 +0000

Of course, never mind that when the Constitution and first 10 Amendments were ratified, the militia consisted of all able bodied males (the statutue is still written that way, pretty much) and they were expected to provide their own rifles.

By: nk

nk — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:43:10 +0000

I have always thought that the Second Amendment came about because we fought a revolution to abolish the distinction between a “gentleman” class which has the right to bear arms and a “peasant” class which does not. But what do I know?

By: Fodder

Fodder — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 16:23:13 +0000

Good catch, Uncle. Sock-puppetting posers are so annoying.

By: k-romulus

k-romulus — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:10:49 +0000

I read the comments and added my own two cents (FWIW). These internet debates can turn into a Chinese fire drill awfully fast, so I doubt I will respond to any of “Jack’s” further comments . . . .

By: #9

#9 — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:20:32 +0000

When someone writes, “The U.S. Supreme Court was no doubt correct” it might be an indication you are about to step on a cow patty. Sounds like “Jack” could be a politician. Bet his hero is Michael Bloomberg.

By: #9

#9 — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 14:17:39 +0000

Typo second sentence Uncle.