<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No takesies backsies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:12:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LibertyNews.org - Liberty and Freedom for All &#187; Gun Grabbers Losing Confidence?</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/comment-page-1/#comment-149824</link>
		<dc:creator>LibertyNews.org - Liberty and Freedom for All &#187; Gun Grabbers Losing Confidence?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/#comment-149824</guid>
		<description>[...] SayUncle and Alphecca are reporting that the Brady Bunch aren&#8217;t quite as confident of their gun-grabbing plans as they were a few weeks ago. On the Federal level this may be true, with President Bush in office there is little chance of them re-enacting their Evil Black Rifle ban in the next two years. They may just lay low, regain the White House and then bring it up, along with all their other hair-brained schemes to prevent criminals from being criminals. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SayUncle and Alphecca are reporting that the Brady Bunch aren&#8217;t quite as confident of their gun-grabbing plans as they were a few weeks ago. On the Federal level this may be true, with President Bush in office there is little chance of them re-enacting their Evil Black Rifle ban in the next two years. They may just lay low, regain the White House and then bring it up, along with all their other hair-brained schemes to prevent criminals from being criminals. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron w</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/comment-page-1/#comment-149198</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/#comment-149198</guid>
		<description>Lyle says, &quot;....but I will once again be the only one to point out the fact that we are having to fight a hard battle over something that is a Constitutionally guaranteed right.&quot;

Very well-said! And with NO help from those who SAY they support support &quot;civil rights&quot;; in fact, they are usually on the side of those who want to disarm us by the hired guns....those also so aptly described by Lyle as &quot;a criminal and belongs in a cage.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyle says, &#8220;&#8230;.but I will once again be the only one to point out the fact that we are having to fight a hard battle over something that is a Constitutionally guaranteed right.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very well-said! And with NO help from those who SAY they support support &#8220;civil rights&#8221;; in fact, they are usually on the side of those who want to disarm us by the hired guns&#8230;.those also so aptly described by Lyle as &#8220;a criminal and belongs in a cage.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/comment-page-1/#comment-148964</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/#comment-148964</guid>
		<description>Not that it matters, but I will once again be the only one to point out the fact that we are having to fight a hard battle over something that is a Constitutionally guaranteed right.

Any politician who takes an Oath to uphold the Constitution, then sets out to destroy it, is a criminal and belongs in a cage.

We should never need to have this conversation at all.  We should simply be able to mind our own fucking business, without the slightest worry that some total shithead, in our own country, someone charged with protecting our rights, would instead choose to attack them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that it matters, but I will once again be the only one to point out the fact that we are having to fight a hard battle over something that is a Constitutionally guaranteed right.</p>
<p>Any politician who takes an Oath to uphold the Constitution, then sets out to destroy it, is a criminal and belongs in a cage.</p>
<p>We should never need to have this conversation at all.  We should simply be able to mind our own fucking business, without the slightest worry that some total shithead, in our own country, someone charged with protecting our rights, would instead choose to attack them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The View From North Central Idaho - Quote of the day--Michael Dukakis</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/comment-page-1/#comment-148953</link>
		<dc:creator>The View From North Central Idaho - Quote of the day--Michael Dukakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/#comment-148953</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Holly</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/comment-page-1/#comment-148931</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/#comment-148931</guid>
		<description>I think this latest episode with Pelosi and Murtha opened alot of eyes.  Most liberal groups are beginning to realize that Nancy Pelosi is waaay overrated as a leader.  The Bradys have figured out that if Pelosi can&#039;t get the Blue Dogs to vote with her on Murtha, she sure as hell isn&#039;t going to get them to vote with her on an AW Ban.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this latest episode with Pelosi and Murtha opened alot of eyes.  Most liberal groups are beginning to realize that Nancy Pelosi is waaay overrated as a leader.  The Bradys have figured out that if Pelosi can&#8217;t get the Blue Dogs to vote with her on Murtha, she sure as hell isn&#8217;t going to get them to vote with her on an AW Ban.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/comment-page-1/#comment-148922</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/#comment-148922</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;...the number of guns that this exception covers would be a single digit percentage.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Yeah, if you round up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;&#8230;the number of guns that this exception covers would be a single digit percentage.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Yeah, if you round up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nylarthotep</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/comment-page-1/#comment-148907</link>
		<dc:creator>Nylarthotep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/#comment-148907</guid>
		<description>Hell, there is a mayor in New Bedford that calls guns &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/11-06/11-21-06/01local.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WMDs. &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&quot;In New Bedford, we regard guns as a weapon of mass destruction,&quot; Mayor Lang told the committee. &quot;We think they are a weapon of mass destruction throughout our cities and towns throughout the United States.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Worst of all is that these idiots have been leaking over the border into NH for a long time. I&#039;m thinking a border fence may be in order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell, there is a mayor in New Bedford that calls guns <a href="http://www.southcoasttoday.com/daily/11-06/11-21-06/01local.htm" rel="nofollow">WMDs. </a><br />
<em>&#8220;In New Bedford, we regard guns as a weapon of mass destruction,&#8221; Mayor Lang told the committee. &#8220;We think they are a weapon of mass destruction throughout our cities and towns throughout the United States.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Worst of all is that these idiots have been leaking over the border into NH for a long time. I&#8217;m thinking a border fence may be in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay G</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/comment-page-1/#comment-148893</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/#comment-148893</guid>
		<description>They are steadfastly proceeding with this BLATANT LIE. Unfucking real.

Here&#039;s a tip from someone who LIVES in MA: EVERY. FUCKING. GUN. MUST. BE. REGISTERED. BY. STATE. LAW.

There is one, and only one, exception: If you move into MA from out-of-state you do not have to register any firearms you bring in with you. I would wager that the number of guns that this exception covers would be a single digit percentage.

Other than that, every single gun in the state of MA is registered. Period. It is STATE LAW that any private sale be recorded within 7 days - we have what used to be called an FA-10 form that needs to be filled out for EVERY personal transaction (see Bruce at mAssbackwards for what is involved on the FA-10, he covered it extensively).

THEY. ARE. LYING.

Plain and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are steadfastly proceeding with this BLATANT LIE. Unfucking real.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a tip from someone who LIVES in MA: EVERY. FUCKING. GUN. MUST. BE. REGISTERED. BY. STATE. LAW.</p>
<p>There is one, and only one, exception: If you move into MA from out-of-state you do not have to register any firearms you bring in with you. I would wager that the number of guns that this exception covers would be a single digit percentage.</p>
<p>Other than that, every single gun in the state of MA is registered. Period. It is STATE LAW that any private sale be recorded within 7 days &#8211; we have what used to be called an FA-10 form that needs to be filled out for EVERY personal transaction (see Bruce at mAssbackwards for what is involved on the FA-10, he covered it extensively).</p>
<p>THEY. ARE. LYING.</p>
<p>Plain and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: countertop</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/comment-page-1/#comment-148892</link>
		<dc:creator>countertop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/22/no_takesies_backsies/#comment-148892</guid>
		<description>surprise, surprise.

not that anyone ever listens to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>surprise, surprise.</p>
<p>not that anyone ever listens to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
