<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two approaches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:14:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bilwick</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-2/#comment-149478</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-149478</guid>
		<description>So if there&#039;s one thing we&#039;ve learned from all this discussion, what would it be? For me, it&#039;s that if Bush, after toppling Saddam, had said, &quot;Well, we didn&#039;t find any WMDs, but . . . Saddam was a child molester! Yeah, child molester--that&#039;s the ticket!&quot; he&#039;d have gotten much more support for from the Left for the war in Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if there&#8217;s one thing we&#8217;ve learned from all this discussion, what would it be? For me, it&#8217;s that if Bush, after toppling Saddam, had said, &#8220;Well, we didn&#8217;t find any WMDs, but . . . Saddam was a child molester! Yeah, child molester&#8211;that&#8217;s the ticket!&#8221; he&#8217;d have gotten much more support for from the Left for the war in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lwk</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-2/#comment-149366</link>
		<dc:creator>lwk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-149366</guid>
		<description>#9 - I did answer your comment, but the site administrator did not allow me to comment.  Probably some snafu, certainly not anything else.  Have a great Thanksgiving, and get lots of shopping done tomorrow (the Wal Mart boycott is &lt;strong&gt;off&lt;/strong&gt;!).  lk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#9 &#8211; I did answer your comment, but the site administrator did not allow me to comment.  Probably some snafu, certainly not anything else.  Have a great Thanksgiving, and get lots of shopping done tomorrow (the Wal Mart boycott is <strong>off</strong>!).  lk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #9</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-2/#comment-149363</link>
		<dc:creator>#9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 23:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-149363</guid>
		<description>lk, catch up. I have read both &quot;Trolling for Idiots&quot; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/08/04/21_things_online_debate_has_taught_me/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Uncle&#039;s &quot;21 Things Online Debate Has Taught Me&quot;&lt;/a&gt;. 

Junior High School Trolling tactics don&#039;t fly here. Try harder. Try issues, issues are good. Play rope a dope over at LGF. Somebody will engage you there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lk, catch up. I have read both &#8220;Trolling for Idiots&#8221; and <a href="http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/08/04/21_things_online_debate_has_taught_me/" rel="nofollow">Uncle&#8217;s &#8220;21 Things Online Debate Has Taught Me&#8221;</a>. </p>
<p>Junior High School Trolling tactics don&#8217;t fly here. Try harder. Try issues, issues are good. Play rope a dope over at LGF. Somebody will engage you there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney A Stanton</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-2/#comment-149359</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney A Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 21:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-149359</guid>
		<description>In the last 26 years the top 4 levels of the Clinton Administration were most well known for lacking: honesty, integrity,and competence. Reno was in the second level so of course she lacks all 3. Only the Jihadists pay her any mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the last 26 years the top 4 levels of the Clinton Administration were most well known for lacking: honesty, integrity,and competence. Reno was in the second level so of course she lacks all 3. Only the Jihadists pay her any mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lk</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-149357</link>
		<dc:creator>lk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-149357</guid>
		<description>#9 - I am unable to write my own material.  I rely on the goodness of others&#039; (material).  When I can&#039;t find good material, I use yours, and others like you who draw a straight line between H Clinton and Waco.  Under that logic, Laura Bush bears responsibity for Katrina (not the hurricane, the man-made disaster afterwards).  And what about Nancy Regan and the marine barracks disaster in Lebanon?  I know I&#039;ll never forgive Mamie for the U-2 incident.  Eleanor and pearl Harbor?  Your logic is Hillary = Bill, you hate Bill, therefore you hate Hillary.  My wife is very glad she does not get equated to me.  But I wonder, maybe it&#039;s the turkey high I am experiencing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#9 &#8211; I am unable to write my own material.  I rely on the goodness of others&#8217; (material).  When I can&#8217;t find good material, I use yours, and others like you who draw a straight line between H Clinton and Waco.  Under that logic, Laura Bush bears responsibity for Katrina (not the hurricane, the man-made disaster afterwards).  And what about Nancy Regan and the marine barracks disaster in Lebanon?  I know I&#8217;ll never forgive Mamie for the U-2 incident.  Eleanor and pearl Harbor?  Your logic is Hillary = Bill, you hate Bill, therefore you hate Hillary.  My wife is very glad she does not get equated to me.  But I wonder, maybe it&#8217;s the turkey high I am experiencing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #9</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-149197</link>
		<dc:creator>#9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-149197</guid>
		<description>Glad to be source material for you lk. See if you can write your own material now.

Plagiarism is the goofiest form of flattery.

Are too, am not, rinse and repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to be source material for you lk. See if you can write your own material now.</p>
<p>Plagiarism is the goofiest form of flattery.</p>
<p>Are too, am not, rinse and repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lk</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-149194</link>
		<dc:creator>lk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 12:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-149194</guid>
		<description>Reno (Bush) was (is) in way over her (his) head. But no adults intervened. Why? Because there were none. The idea that Reno (Bush) has any standing to call for any investigation is comical (last thing Bush wants is an investigation, of anything).

No event in American history compares to Waco (Iraq). It shouldn’t have happened. Yes, this disqualifies Reno (Bush) from even speaking. No soup for Reno (Bush).

What kind of person uses Janet Reno (George Bush) as a role model?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reno (Bush) was (is) in way over her (his) head. But no adults intervened. Why? Because there were none. The idea that Reno (Bush) has any standing to call for any investigation is comical (last thing Bush wants is an investigation, of anything).</p>
<p>No event in American history compares to Waco (Iraq). It shouldn’t have happened. Yes, this disqualifies Reno (Bush) from even speaking. No soup for Reno (Bush).</p>
<p>What kind of person uses Janet Reno (George Bush) as a role model?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #9</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-149083</link>
		<dc:creator>#9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 02:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-149083</guid>
		<description>Oh can&#039;t we all get along? 

Actually no. That would require some people to grow up.

When Hillary runs for President in 2008 please remember that this logic that brought Waco should be a consideration. Reno was in way over her head. But no adults intervened. Why? Because there were none. The idea that Reno has any standing to call for any investigation is comical.

No event in American history compares to Waco. It shouldn&#039;t have happened. Yes, this disqualifies Reno from even speaking. No soup for Reno.

What kind of person uses Janet Reno as a role model?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh can&#8217;t we all get along? </p>
<p>Actually no. That would require some people to grow up.</p>
<p>When Hillary runs for President in 2008 please remember that this logic that brought Waco should be a consideration. Reno was in way over her head. But no adults intervened. Why? Because there were none. The idea that Reno has any standing to call for any investigation is comical.</p>
<p>No event in American history compares to Waco. It shouldn&#8217;t have happened. Yes, this disqualifies Reno from even speaking. No soup for Reno.</p>
<p>What kind of person uses Janet Reno as a role model?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lk</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-149078</link>
		<dc:creator>lk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 01:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-149078</guid>
		<description>Again, bad judgements in the past should not preclude you from doing good deeds currently (and Reno has has bi-partisan co-actors).  And,if bad judgements in the past are reason for disqualification, then W can no longer act (as if he ever did, since he is an idiot, and only acts at the behest of others - he&#039;s a puppet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, bad judgements in the past should not preclude you from doing good deeds currently (and Reno has has bi-partisan co-actors).  And,if bad judgements in the past are reason for disqualification, then W can no longer act (as if he ever did, since he is an idiot, and only acts at the behest of others &#8211; he&#8217;s a puppet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fre lapides</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-149076</link>
		<dc:creator>fre lapides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 23:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-149076</guid>
		<description>If you can not distinguish between what Reno did,for better or worse,asher job, or how her departmentsxcrewed up, with what the Bush administration is putting into law, then you ought not simply use such smart-assed wise remarks...Say something that makes sense. Any simpleton can call names. Children do it all the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you can not distinguish between what Reno did,for better or worse,asher job, or how her departmentsxcrewed up, with what the Bush administration is putting into law, then you ought not simply use such smart-assed wise remarks&#8230;Say something that makes sense. Any simpleton can call names. Children do it all the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corwin</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148987</link>
		<dc:creator>corwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148987</guid>
		<description>&quot;If  we dismiss a person&#039;s opinion because  of prir  bad acts&quot;,etc per LK is just  ridiculous.Everyone&#039;s reputation is dependent on prior judgements.And we&#039;re not talking about a minor mistake.Waco-lots o f dead people,for no god reason,Elian Gonzalez-back to Cuba,refusing  to  empower independent investigation despite her underlings request.This woman is the Babe Ruth  of fuck ups.
   And these acts f cosmic stupidity were before the Parkinson&#039;s kicked in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If  we dismiss a person&#8217;s opinion because  of prir  bad acts&#8221;,etc per LK is just  ridiculous.Everyone&#8217;s reputation is dependent on prior judgements.And we&#8217;re not talking about a minor mistake.Waco-lots o f dead people,for no god reason,Elian Gonzalez-back to Cuba,refusing  to  empower independent investigation despite her underlings request.This woman is the Babe Ruth  of fuck ups.<br />
   And these acts f cosmic stupidity were before the Parkinson&#8217;s kicked in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nony Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148986</link>
		<dc:creator>Nony Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148986</guid>
		<description>Not that I think it will do any good, but:
Iraq is a country, established by fiat by other countries dividing something on a map, completely ignoring who actually lived in the area.
No one currently in power, in any department, did this.
The declaration of war by the exectutive branch, and ratified by the legislative branch, on mulitple occasions, is responisble for the war. Both of them. Don&#039;t ask me who was responsible for the bombing runs during Clinton, &#039;cause I wasn&#039;t paying attention. Attempting to use a country name or a current war zone to discuss excesses by the JUDICIAL BRANCH of MULTIPLE ADMINISTRATIONS is going to lead to heavy amounts of eye-rolling.
If you wish to make the arguement that we&#039;ve had less than stellar reporting, that the Times has just run stories on how documents siezed from the Iraqis shouldn&#039;t have been released because they could tell Tehran how to make nukes, that may be we don&#039;t know everything we think we do, and that the alphabet soup of agencies not only might not be too sure of what each other are doing, but aren&#039;t always sure themselves, that&#039;s fine. But you have to type it out, because otherwise, I&#039;m going to assume I can just say DeKalb County and act smug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I think it will do any good, but:<br />
Iraq is a country, established by fiat by other countries dividing something on a map, completely ignoring who actually lived in the area.<br />
No one currently in power, in any department, did this.<br />
The declaration of war by the exectutive branch, and ratified by the legislative branch, on mulitple occasions, is responisble for the war. Both of them. Don&#8217;t ask me who was responsible for the bombing runs during Clinton, &#8217;cause I wasn&#8217;t paying attention. Attempting to use a country name or a current war zone to discuss excesses by the JUDICIAL BRANCH of MULTIPLE ADMINISTRATIONS is going to lead to heavy amounts of eye-rolling.<br />
If you wish to make the arguement that we&#8217;ve had less than stellar reporting, that the Times has just run stories on how documents siezed from the Iraqis shouldn&#8217;t have been released because they could tell Tehran how to make nukes, that may be we don&#8217;t know everything we think we do, and that the alphabet soup of agencies not only might not be too sure of what each other are doing, but aren&#8217;t always sure themselves, that&#8217;s fine. But you have to type it out, because otherwise, I&#8217;m going to assume I can just say DeKalb County and act smug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148985</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148985</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no wingnut.  But then, you think Reynolds is one.  What&#039;s the criteria for that?  Doesn&#039;t vote the way you do?  Doesn&#039;t agree with you on everything?  Just curious.

And yes, dog and pony.  You go through a couple of &#039;graphs stating I don&#039;t know something and use it incorrectly in an effort to deflect criticism; then acknowledge I do, but for the wrong reasons.  And I&#039;m still wrong. Your insults are contradictory. Well, which is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no wingnut.  But then, you think Reynolds is one.  What&#8217;s the criteria for that?  Doesn&#8217;t vote the way you do?  Doesn&#8217;t agree with you on everything?  Just curious.</p>
<p>And yes, dog and pony.  You go through a couple of &#8216;graphs stating I don&#8217;t know something and use it incorrectly in an effort to deflect criticism; then acknowledge I do, but for the wrong reasons.  And I&#8217;m still wrong. Your insults are contradictory. Well, which is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dick</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148984</link>
		<dc:creator>dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148984</guid>
		<description>What always bothered me about the Waco incident was that it did not even need to happen at all.  David Koresh went into Waco every week to go shopping for groceries.  If they wanted to arrest him, then arrest him there and you would not have had to attack the compound and kill all those kids.  

It was the decision made under the mandate of Ms Reno that caused all those problems and nothing she can say or do at this point in time will change that.   I hope she dreams about the screams and cries of those kids burned to death because of her stupid decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What always bothered me about the Waco incident was that it did not even need to happen at all.  David Koresh went into Waco every week to go shopping for groceries.  If they wanted to arrest him, then arrest him there and you would not have had to attack the compound and kill all those kids.  </p>
<p>It was the decision made under the mandate of Ms Reno that caused all those problems and nothing she can say or do at this point in time will change that.   I hope she dreams about the screams and cries of those kids burned to death because of her stupid decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salvage</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148979</link>
		<dc:creator>salvage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148979</guid>
		<description>Dog and pony...?

You are fast become my favorite wingnut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dog and pony&#8230;?</p>
<p>You are fast become my favorite wingnut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148978</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148978</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Iraq is a straw-man?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;Perhaps you don’t actually understand what the term ’straw man’ means do you? ... So it isn’t a strawman at all. So there you’ve use it correctly but are still wrong.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

When you have to go through that dog &amp; pony show to set up an insult, it shows you have nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Iraq is a straw-man?</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes.  </p>
<blockquote><p>Perhaps you don’t actually understand what the term ’straw man’ means do you? &#8230; So it isn’t a strawman at all. So there you’ve use it correctly but are still wrong.</p></blockquote>
<p>When you have to go through that dog &amp; pony show to set up an insult, it shows you have nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nony Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148974</link>
		<dc:creator>Nony Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148974</guid>
		<description>Being around a wacko is unsettling; being around a wacko who shoots of an AK-47 is a different thing entirely.
Purchased legally, yes I think so. I thought there was something to do with the outlawing of automatic weapons in civilian hands that meant they had some that were no longer legal to operate, and / or weren&#039;t grandfathered into the regulations. 
I also believe that their contruction methods left Quite A Bit to be desired, and I don&#039;t remember any pictures of a pool either finished or under construction (Did I miss something? It&#039;s entirely possible that I did). Just like you can obtain rat poison, but if you don&#039;t have a rat infestation and there are rumors you&#039;re going to try to poison someone, you may very well be investigated.
I thought the FBI only got involved if you had transported kids across state lines, otherwise it was a local enforcement issue? Not that the ATF should have had anything to do with it, mind you...
I&#039;m so not arguing with your last sentence. And you haven&#039;t even got into the trumped-up drug charges, which is why they had helos in the air, further confusing the issue of who shot whom from where and totally screwing with the accousitics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being around a wacko is unsettling; being around a wacko who shoots of an AK-47 is a different thing entirely.<br />
Purchased legally, yes I think so. I thought there was something to do with the outlawing of automatic weapons in civilian hands that meant they had some that were no longer legal to operate, and / or weren&#8217;t grandfathered into the regulations.<br />
I also believe that their contruction methods left Quite A Bit to be desired, and I don&#8217;t remember any pictures of a pool either finished or under construction (Did I miss something? It&#8217;s entirely possible that I did). Just like you can obtain rat poison, but if you don&#8217;t have a rat infestation and there are rumors you&#8217;re going to try to poison someone, you may very well be investigated.<br />
I thought the FBI only got involved if you had transported kids across state lines, otherwise it was a local enforcement issue? Not that the ATF should have had anything to do with it, mind you&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;m so not arguing with your last sentence. And you haven&#8217;t even got into the trumped-up drug charges, which is why they had helos in the air, further confusing the issue of who shot whom from where and totally screwing with the accousitics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: salvage</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148973</link>
		<dc:creator>salvage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148973</guid>
		<description>Iraq is a straw-man?

I&#039;m trying to understand what you could possibly mean... my point is you seem to have a rather Quaker-like attitude towards the Waco whackos but I suspect* a more war-like attitude when it comes to Iraq. Broken eggs for omlettes and all that.

Perhaps you don&#039;t actually understand what the term &#039;straw man&#039; means do you? You just sort of drop it as a way of avoiding points thinking it a silver bullet to kill an argument you don&#039;t like don&#039;t you?

Well you might understand it because it makes a bit more sense in the context of Clinton except one can easily find many wingnuts blaming Clinton for all kinds of stuff, including Iraq. So it isn&#039;t a strawman at all. So there you&#039;ve use it correctly but are still wrong.

Nice try tho.

&gt;Okay, which letter in ATF stands for ‘preventing child abuse’

That&#039;s what I love about Instapundit; he digs out these wingnut gems for us to marvel over.

*Just a guess, please let me know if I&#039;m wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iraq is a straw-man?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to understand what you could possibly mean&#8230; my point is you seem to have a rather Quaker-like attitude towards the Waco whackos but I suspect* a more war-like attitude when it comes to Iraq. Broken eggs for omlettes and all that.</p>
<p>Perhaps you don&#8217;t actually understand what the term &#8217;straw man&#8217; means do you? You just sort of drop it as a way of avoiding points thinking it a silver bullet to kill an argument you don&#8217;t like don&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>Well you might understand it because it makes a bit more sense in the context of Clinton except one can easily find many wingnuts blaming Clinton for all kinds of stuff, including Iraq. So it isn&#8217;t a strawman at all. So there you&#8217;ve use it correctly but are still wrong.</p>
<p>Nice try tho.</p>
<p>&gt;Okay, which letter in ATF stands for ‘preventing child abuse’</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I love about Instapundit; he digs out these wingnut gems for us to marvel over.</p>
<p>*Just a guess, please let me know if I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilwick</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148971</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148971</guid>
		<description>Janet Reno&#039;s right-hand man Tommy Flanagan (pronounced &quot;Flah-nay&#039;-gan&quot;), liaison between the Department of Justice, the ATF, FBI and other law-enforcement agencies at Waco, acting as Ms. Reno&#039;s spokesperson at Waco: &quot;Well, they had guns. . .  [&lt;em&gt; aside, in a whisper:] &lt;/em&gt; . . . what, they were legal? [&lt;em&gt; back to reporters] . . .  Well, er . . . they were child molesters! Yeah, that&#039;s the ticket! Child molesters!&quot;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janet Reno&#8217;s right-hand man Tommy Flanagan (pronounced &#8220;Flah-nay&#8217;-gan&#8221;), liaison between the Department of Justice, the ATF, FBI and other law-enforcement agencies at Waco, acting as Ms. Reno&#8217;s spokesperson at Waco: &#8220;Well, they had guns. . .  [<em> aside, in a whisper:] </em> . . . what, they were legal? [<em> back to reporters] . . .  Well, er . . . they were child molesters! Yeah, that&#8217;s the ticket! Child molesters!&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Janet Reno Criticizes Anti-Terror Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148969</link>
		<dc:creator>Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Janet Reno Criticizes Anti-Terror Policy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148969</guid>
		<description>[...] Related thoughts from SaysUncle      &#160; [link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related thoughts from SaysUncle      &nbsp; [link] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GW Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148968</link>
		<dc:creator>GW Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148968</guid>
		<description>in addition, the ATF kept changing their story on why they had the right to harangue Koresh

Started out, &#039;they have guns&#039;. All purchased legally
Then it was &#039;they have dynamite&#039;. Again, purchased legally (building a pool)
Then it became &#039;they are abusing children&#039;

Okay, which letter in ATF stands for &#039;preventing child abuse&#039;

If that was the case, and we have only hearsay evidence, the FBI should have been called in as that IS their jusridiction

The ATF acted like idiots and made a tense situation impossible and, in the end, fatal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in addition, the ATF kept changing their story on why they had the right to harangue Koresh</p>
<p>Started out, &#8216;they have guns&#8217;. All purchased legally<br />
Then it was &#8216;they have dynamite&#8217;. Again, purchased legally (building a pool)<br />
Then it became &#8216;they are abusing children&#8217;</p>
<p>Okay, which letter in ATF stands for &#8216;preventing child abuse&#8217;</p>
<p>If that was the case, and we have only hearsay evidence, the FBI should have been called in as that IS their jusridiction</p>
<p>The ATF acted like idiots and made a tense situation impossible and, in the end, fatal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GW Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148967</link>
		<dc:creator>GW Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148967</guid>
		<description>So, vis a vis Koresh: Is being a wacko a capital offence?

Gore spouts nonsense about global warming, Michael Moore is an habitual liar, George Galloway has referred to Palestine as being the &#039;jewel of the Middle East&#039;

Hmmm...ya convinced me. Death sentences all &#039;round!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, vis a vis Koresh: Is being a wacko a capital offence?</p>
<p>Gore spouts nonsense about global warming, Michael Moore is an habitual liar, George Galloway has referred to Palestine as being the &#8216;jewel of the Middle East&#8217;</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;ya convinced me. Death sentences all &#8217;round!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.W. of Freespeech.com</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148956</link>
		<dc:creator>A.W. of Freespeech.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148956</guid>
		<description>I would say that I am not impressed with the advice of the person who, under her watch, the FBI and CIA developed a wall of separation that greatly contributed to the likelihood that 9-11 occured.

She may have been too tough on &quot;Christian&quot; standoffers, and little cuban boys, but when it came to Jihadist terrorists, she was a f---ing pantywaist.  I could care less what she or anyone else from the Clinton era thinks.  They are the idiots who dropped the ball.  They are the ones who thought if we were nice, we wouldn&#039;t be hit.  I don&#039;t care what they think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that I am not impressed with the advice of the person who, under her watch, the FBI and CIA developed a wall of separation that greatly contributed to the likelihood that 9-11 occured.</p>
<p>She may have been too tough on &#8220;Christian&#8221; standoffers, and little cuban boys, but when it came to Jihadist terrorists, she was a f&#8212;ing pantywaist.  I could care less what she or anyone else from the Clinton era thinks.  They are the idiots who dropped the ball.  They are the ones who thought if we were nice, we wouldn&#8217;t be hit.  I don&#8217;t care what they think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nony Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148950</link>
		<dc:creator>Nony Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148950</guid>
		<description>Er.. Maybe it didn&#039;t like multiple bits of random punctuation instead of full curse words? 
The missing bits claimed that they *ahem* messed up the raid. Big time. Texans are allowed to resist government officials acting like Jackbooted Thugs. And months of being closely watched, cutting off electricity, using sleep deprivation techniques before storming a compound does not make for the most rational response on the other side of the door. Even when their children&#039;s lives were at stake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er.. Maybe it didn&#8217;t like multiple bits of random punctuation instead of full curse words?<br />
The missing bits claimed that they *ahem* messed up the raid. Big time. Texans are allowed to resist government officials acting like Jackbooted Thugs. And months of being closely watched, cutting off electricity, using sleep deprivation techniques before storming a compound does not make for the most rational response on the other side of the door. Even when their children&#8217;s lives were at stake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nony Mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148946</link>
		<dc:creator>Nony Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148946</guid>
		<description>So the ATF agents who died because Koresh&#039;s nut jobs were firing on them don&#039;t make them both crazy and trying (and managed) to kill people? Just verifying...
Todd McKeehan, Robert Williams, Conway LeBleu, and Steve Willis aren&#039;t around to comment.

bob,
I believe the reason that people from the area wished to slow-roast him over an open fire came from allegations from multiple accounts both before and after the raid that Koresh demanded &#039;access&#039; to every woman, and several of his child brides had been &#039;broken in&#039; prior to their teens. 

That being said...
The Branch Dividian compound raid is a prime example of how to fu</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the ATF agents who died because Koresh&#8217;s nut jobs were firing on them don&#8217;t make them both crazy and trying (and managed) to kill people? Just verifying&#8230;<br />
Todd McKeehan, Robert Williams, Conway LeBleu, and Steve Willis aren&#8217;t around to comment.</p>
<p>bob,<br />
I believe the reason that people from the area wished to slow-roast him over an open fire came from allegations from multiple accounts both before and after the raid that Koresh demanded &#8216;access&#8217; to every woman, and several of his child brides had been &#8216;broken in&#8217; prior to their teens. </p>
<p>That being said&#8230;<br />
The Branch Dividian compound raid is a prime example of how to fu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148945</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148945</guid>
		<description>Maybe somebody above has already mentioned this, but it couldn&#039;t wait, I haven&#039;t read all the comments yet, but I will.  This needs said now. 

Koresh did not have illegal weapons. Period. That has been proven time and again.  In fact,  the ATF was invited in to inspect them after the AWB was passed to make certain.  The offer of surrender of any weapons that had been &quot;illegalized&quot; by the ban was made. The ATF declined the invitation and then put on their little &quot;intimidate America&quot; show. Just to let the rest of us know what could happen to our children if we didn&#039;t curry favor.

The Davidians were certainly eccentric, but no one has ever shown them to have harmed anybody.  In a free society you can be as eccentric as you want if you don&#039;t harm others.  The incident at Waco was simply federally committed murder, Ruby Ridge on a larger scale.  There is no justification for it.

The government opened fire when Koresh opened the door.   They went there to kill.  There can be no argument about that.  Everything done by the authorities made killing inevitable.  

I suggest you read more on it. Study the sheriff&#039;s statements, the Texas Ranger&#039;s statements if they haven&#039;t been sanitized and if you can get access to original film watch it closely.

I am not a conspiracy nut, but I do know one when I see one.   All evidence points, even post event, points to the mission being considered a success in the manner the administration approved.  How else does one explain the promotion of the FBI agent in charge to second highest post in the FBI when he was the same one in charge at Ruby Ridge, unless he was being rewarded for doing what was expected of him?  Nobody rewards fuckups like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe somebody above has already mentioned this, but it couldn&#8217;t wait, I haven&#8217;t read all the comments yet, but I will.  This needs said now. </p>
<p>Koresh did not have illegal weapons. Period. That has been proven time and again.  In fact,  the ATF was invited in to inspect them after the AWB was passed to make certain.  The offer of surrender of any weapons that had been &#8220;illegalized&#8221; by the ban was made. The ATF declined the invitation and then put on their little &#8220;intimidate America&#8221; show. Just to let the rest of us know what could happen to our children if we didn&#8217;t curry favor.</p>
<p>The Davidians were certainly eccentric, but no one has ever shown them to have harmed anybody.  In a free society you can be as eccentric as you want if you don&#8217;t harm others.  The incident at Waco was simply federally committed murder, Ruby Ridge on a larger scale.  There is no justification for it.</p>
<p>The government opened fire when Koresh opened the door.   They went there to kill.  There can be no argument about that.  Everything done by the authorities made killing inevitable.  </p>
<p>I suggest you read more on it. Study the sheriff&#8217;s statements, the Texas Ranger&#8217;s statements if they haven&#8217;t been sanitized and if you can get access to original film watch it closely.</p>
<p>I am not a conspiracy nut, but I do know one when I see one.   All evidence points, even post event, points to the mission being considered a success in the manner the administration approved.  How else does one explain the promotion of the FBI agent in charge to second highest post in the FBI when he was the same one in charge at Ruby Ridge, unless he was being rewarded for doing what was expected of him?  Nobody rewards fuckups like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firehand</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148944</link>
		<dc:creator>Firehand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148944</guid>
		<description>And, if I remember correctly, that NRA letter &lt;em&gt;quoted&lt;/em&gt; the &#039;jack-booted thugs&#039; bit from a speech made on the floor of the House by a Democrat Rep(from Wisconsin, I think).  He said it in the House, and it fell in a hole.  The NRA quotes him in a letter, and the friggin&#039; ceiling falls in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, if I remember correctly, that NRA letter <em>quoted</em> the &#8216;jack-booted thugs&#8217; bit from a speech made on the floor of the House by a Democrat Rep(from Wisconsin, I think).  He said it in the House, and it fell in a hole.  The NRA quotes him in a letter, and the friggin&#8217; ceiling falls in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilwick</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148940</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148940</guid>
		<description>One of the very few reasons I find to be thankful Bush was elected president is the nightmare vision of a Gore presidency retaining Janet (&quot;The Torch of Statism&quot;) Reno as Attorney General. Can you imagine, post 9/11, Jackboots Janet with war powers behind her? This entire country would go up in flames. Literally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the very few reasons I find to be thankful Bush was elected president is the nightmare vision of a Gore presidency retaining Janet (&#8221;The Torch of Statism&#8221;) Reno as Attorney General. Can you imagine, post 9/11, Jackboots Janet with war powers behind her? This entire country would go up in flames. Literally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TAT</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148935</link>
		<dc:creator>TAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148935</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Of course America set the whole country, figuratively, on fire&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Actually it is the terrorist &quot;insurgents&quot; who are blowing up Iraqis. Some are imports, others were the same people who raped, oppressed and enslaved Iraqis prior to the US liberation of Iraq from the Baathists. But remember, we live in an age of moral relativism. If I &quot;invade&quot; your yard to stop you from beating your wife to death, you have every &quot;right&quot; to try to kill me and also kill your children (especially if you happen to be &quot;brown person&quot; - never mind your victims are also brown poeple). Welcome to the gnostic age, where evil is tolerated and celebrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Of course America set the whole country, figuratively, on fire</p></blockquote>
<p>Actually it is the terrorist &#8220;insurgents&#8221; who are blowing up Iraqis. Some are imports, others were the same people who raped, oppressed and enslaved Iraqis prior to the US liberation of Iraq from the Baathists. But remember, we live in an age of moral relativism. If I &#8220;invade&#8221; your yard to stop you from beating your wife to death, you have every &#8220;right&#8221; to try to kill me and also kill your children (especially if you happen to be &#8220;brown person&#8221; &#8211; never mind your victims are also brown poeple). Welcome to the gnostic age, where evil is tolerated and celebrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/11/21/two_approaches/comment-page-1/#comment-148932</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/11/21/two_approaches/#comment-148932</guid>
		<description>Salvage, 

Being crazy never justifies setting someone on fire.  Being crazy and trying to kill someone might justify it but just being crazy doesn&#039;t cut it.  

Iraq is a straw-man. And no one blamed Clinton (also a straw man). The criticism was of the JD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salvage, </p>
<p>Being crazy never justifies setting someone on fire.  Being crazy and trying to kill someone might justify it but just being crazy doesn&#8217;t cut it.  </p>
<p>Iraq is a straw-man. And no one blamed Clinton (also a straw man). The criticism was of the JD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
