<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No, it&#8217;s only one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/comment-page-1/#comment-134942</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 01:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/#comment-134942</guid>
		<description>I have an L1A1 that was politically corrected and sports the plastic thumbhole stock.  I thought I would hate it, I don&#039;t.  I love the damn stock, although  my favorite guns are some very old Russians (because of their history), the L1A1 is by far the easiest to shoot and makes me shoot much better than I do with any other rifle.  It is in 7.62 NATO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an L1A1 that was politically corrected and sports the plastic thumbhole stock.  I thought I would hate it, I don&#8217;t.  I love the damn stock, although  my favorite guns are some very old Russians (because of their history), the L1A1 is by far the easiest to shoot and makes me shoot much better than I do with any other rifle.  It is in 7.62 NATO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigivald</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/comment-page-1/#comment-134915</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigivald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/#comment-134915</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ak-47.net/ak47/mak90.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AK47.net&lt;/a&gt; tells me MAK stands for &quot;Modified AK&quot;, which makes a lot more sense than &quot;Makarov&quot;, who had nothing to do with Chinese AKs.

I had one, in .223, the ugly thumbhole stock (it was actually pretty good and VERY reliable, though I got rid of it when I finally got an AR; AR magazines are much cheaper and easier to find than .223 AK mags for the MAK, plus the AR doesn&#039;t dent the brass to hell and back then fired).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ak-47.net/ak47/mak90.html" rel="nofollow">AK47.net</a> tells me MAK stands for &#8220;Modified AK&#8221;, which makes a lot more sense than &#8220;Makarov&#8221;, who had nothing to do with Chinese AKs.</p>
<p>I had one, in .223, the ugly thumbhole stock (it was actually pretty good and VERY reliable, though I got rid of it when I finally got an AR; AR magazines are much cheaper and easier to find than .223 AK mags for the MAK, plus the AR doesn&#8217;t dent the brass to hell and back then fired).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/comment-page-1/#comment-134902</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/#comment-134902</guid>
		<description>Credit, sure.

Slack? No way!  =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Credit, sure.</p>
<p>Slack? No way!  =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guav</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/comment-page-1/#comment-134893</link>
		<dc:creator>Guav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/#comment-134893</guid>
		<description>Hey, I&#039;m just glad they didn&#039;t call it an AK-47 automatic assault rifle like they usually do—gotta give &#039;em credit for being &lt;i&gt;not quite as wrong&lt;/i&gt; as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;m just glad they didn&#8217;t call it an AK-47 automatic assault rifle like they usually do—gotta give &#8216;em credit for being <i>not quite as wrong</i> as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/comment-page-1/#comment-134814</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/#comment-134814</guid>
		<description>This story has its facts wrong. Firstly, the MAK stands for Makarov, and Mac stands for Military Armament Corporation. There is no such thing as a Mac 90.

Also inaccurate is the sentance &quot;Manufacturers got around the ban by making the weapons under new names, without the prohibited features.&quot; , which is inflammatory and misleading. 

A truer statement woyld be &quot;Manufacturers COMPLIED WITH the ban by making NEW weapons without the prohibited features.&quot; , which is, in fact, what they did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story has its facts wrong. Firstly, the MAK stands for Makarov, and Mac stands for Military Armament Corporation. There is no such thing as a Mac 90.</p>
<p>Also inaccurate is the sentance &#8220;Manufacturers got around the ban by making the weapons under new names, without the prohibited features.&#8221; , which is inflammatory and misleading. </p>
<p>A truer statement woyld be &#8220;Manufacturers COMPLIED WITH the ban by making NEW weapons without the prohibited features.&#8221; , which is, in fact, what they did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/comment-page-1/#comment-134793</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/11/no_its_only_one/#comment-134793</guid>
		<description>Apparently, there are some folks who would be more comfortable with a kid bringing a 30-30 lever gun or a pump-action shotgun to school. &#039;Cause you&#039;d be so much less dead taking a 12 ga. slug to the midsection.

We should be thankful that he brought such an unreliable gun that jammed up on him, instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, there are some folks who would be more comfortable with a kid bringing a 30-30 lever gun or a pump-action shotgun to school. &#8216;Cause you&#8217;d be so much less dead taking a 12 ga. slug to the midsection.</p>
<p>We should be thankful that he brought such an unreliable gun that jammed up on him, instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

