<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quiz time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/09/quiz_time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/09/quiz_time/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:57:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/09/quiz_time/comment-page-1/#comment-134011</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/09/quiz_time/#comment-134011</guid>
		<description>The responder knows as Cartman provides a good example of how to argue for our side.  Name calling and using language that we use among ourselves is not liable to seem persuasive.  I think it helps to know what arguments do and don&#039;t make us sound like raving loons to people who aren&#039;t part of the shooting community.  For instance:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;I’m happy to concede that tougher Gun laws may help but not without some sort of emotionally neutral and sound argument. I’ll leave you with some fud for thought: Has the ban on recreational drugs stopped people from using them?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
This is a good argument most people can wrap their heads around

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;No, you didn&#039;t hit a nerve. As I know you to be immature fool and un-representative of the majority of Australians, it is impossible for you to get me upset. You are clearly delusional if you think I live in fear. It seems it is I who hit the nerve with you. If you are so brave and manly, why don&#039;t you try walking around New York or Chicago late at night? When some crack head tries to rob you, you can always reason with him, with your skills I sure you escape unscathed.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Bad argument.  Most foreigners who have never been here imagine America as a nation rife with crime.  This is not true.  It just reinforces their belief that American is a violent lawless place where everyone is running around shooting each other.  I think it&#039;s OK to use defense against criminals as an argument, but frame it properly.

Also, although you and I know being able to resist tyrrany is a key reason for an armed populace, to ordinary people it makes you sound like a raving lunatic.  Most people I think are more persuaded by the self-defense angle.  The RKBA issues are persuasive to many as well, but if you say &quot;We should have the right to keep and bear arms so that we may defend life, liberty, and property&quot; most people can wrap their heads around that.  If you say &quot;We have the right to keep and bear arms so that we can overthrow our government when it gets despotic&quot; most people will think you&#039;re a nutjob.  

We have to be careful when presenting our side to non-gun folk.  Be respectful, let them be the bozos, and remember that most people have never though much about this stuff, so ease into it slowly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The responder knows as Cartman provides a good example of how to argue for our side.  Name calling and using language that we use among ourselves is not liable to seem persuasive.  I think it helps to know what arguments do and don&#8217;t make us sound like raving loons to people who aren&#8217;t part of the shooting community.  For instance:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>I’m happy to concede that tougher Gun laws may help but not without some sort of emotionally neutral and sound argument. I’ll leave you with some fud for thought: Has the ban on recreational drugs stopped people from using them?</i></p></blockquote>
<p>This is a good argument most people can wrap their heads around</p>
<blockquote><p><i>No, you didn&#8217;t hit a nerve. As I know you to be immature fool and un-representative of the majority of Australians, it is impossible for you to get me upset. You are clearly delusional if you think I live in fear. It seems it is I who hit the nerve with you. If you are so brave and manly, why don&#8217;t you try walking around New York or Chicago late at night? When some crack head tries to rob you, you can always reason with him, with your skills I sure you escape unscathed.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Bad argument.  Most foreigners who have never been here imagine America as a nation rife with crime.  This is not true.  It just reinforces their belief that American is a violent lawless place where everyone is running around shooting each other.  I think it&#8217;s OK to use defense against criminals as an argument, but frame it properly.</p>
<p>Also, although you and I know being able to resist tyrrany is a key reason for an armed populace, to ordinary people it makes you sound like a raving lunatic.  Most people I think are more persuaded by the self-defense angle.  The RKBA issues are persuasive to many as well, but if you say &#8220;We should have the right to keep and bear arms so that we may defend life, liberty, and property&#8221; most people can wrap their heads around that.  If you say &#8220;We have the right to keep and bear arms so that we can overthrow our government when it gets despotic&#8221; most people will think you&#8217;re a nutjob.  </p>
<p>We have to be careful when presenting our side to non-gun folk.  Be respectful, let them be the bozos, and remember that most people have never though much about this stuff, so ease into it slowly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravenwood's Universe</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/09/quiz_time/comment-page-1/#comment-133989</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravenwood's Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/09/quiz_time/#comment-133989</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stupid is as stupid does&lt;/strong&gt;

There seems to be a notion that gun grabbers cannot possibly be as stupid as they sound. Some theorize that they are actually pro-gunners in disguise. As if they are part of a conspiracy (coordinated or un-) to make the...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stupid is as stupid does</strong></p>
<p>There seems to be a notion that gun grabbers cannot possibly be as stupid as they sound. Some theorize that they are actually pro-gunners in disguise. As if they are part of a conspiracy (coordinated or un-) to make the&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/09/quiz_time/comment-page-1/#comment-133987</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/09/quiz_time/#comment-133987</guid>
		<description>I have not but maybe I should start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not but maybe I should start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravenwood</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/09/quiz_time/comment-page-1/#comment-133986</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravenwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/09/quiz_time/#comment-133986</guid>
		<description>That leads me to ask.. as a pro-gunner, have you ever written something like that to make the antis look bad?  If not, would you?  Why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That leads me to ask.. as a pro-gunner, have you ever written something like that to make the antis look bad?  If not, would you?  Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nylarthotep</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/09/quiz_time/comment-page-1/#comment-133985</link>
		<dc:creator>Nylarthotep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/09/quiz_time/#comment-133985</guid>
		<description>A Ruger Bolt-action is a &quot;scary&quot; gun? 

I&#039;m going to say calling him a moron is an insult to morons the world over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Ruger Bolt-action is a &#8220;scary&#8221; gun? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to say calling him a moron is an insult to morons the world over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/09/quiz_time/comment-page-1/#comment-133969</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/09/quiz_time/#comment-133969</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m starting to think that a &quot;computer&quot; doesn&#039;t sound like something an anti-gun editorialist would need. Thppppt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to think that a &#8220;computer&#8221; doesn&#8217;t sound like something an anti-gun editorialist would need. Thppppt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: countertop</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/10/09/quiz_time/comment-page-1/#comment-133966</link>
		<dc:creator>countertop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/10/09/quiz_time/#comment-133966</guid>
		<description>You missed the obvious answer . . . a completely moronic and deranged monkey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed the obvious answer . . . a completely moronic and deranged monkey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
