<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I thought it was just the Brits who were afraid of knives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: triticale</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108816</link>
		<dc:creator>triticale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 02:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108816</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Dont you think it is rather disturbing that there are 12 comments regarding which method is better: Cutting or Stabbing?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And nary a word about slicing...

Seriously, I&#039;d say they serve different functions. Slashing is likely to end an endable fight sooner, and with less legal complications. I taught my son, who shaves with and carries a straight razor, something I learned in seventh grade. Open up an eyebrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Dont you think it is rather disturbing that there are 12 comments regarding which method is better: Cutting or Stabbing?</p></blockquote>
<p>And nary a word about slicing&#8230;</p>
<p>Seriously, I&#8217;d say they serve different functions. Slashing is likely to end an endable fight sooner, and with less legal complications. I taught my son, who shaves with and carries a straight razor, something I learned in seventh grade. Open up an eyebrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108721</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108721</guid>
		<description>Dont you think it is rather disturbing that there are 12 comments regarding which method is better: Cutting or Stabbing? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont you think it is rather disturbing that there are 12 comments regarding which method is better: Cutting or Stabbing? <img src='http://www.saysuncle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108711</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108711</guid>
		<description>Everything I&#039;ve read is that stabbing is more effective. You can do lots of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=183458&amp;highlight=knife+fight+photos&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nasty damage&lt;/a&gt; with slices, but it&#039;s too hard to get to anything vital with a short blade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything I&#8217;ve read is that stabbing is more effective. You can do lots of <a href="http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=183458&amp;highlight=knife+fight+photos" rel="nofollow">nasty damage</a> with slices, but it&#8217;s too hard to get to anything vital with a short blade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brutal Hugger</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108707</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutal Hugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 18:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108707</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Uncle on the cutting rather than stabbing.  I&#039;m not sure why people think cuts can only be shallow and won&#039;t reach vital places.  I suppose it&#039;s possible that stabs go deeper, but if you&#039;re cut isn&#039;t deep enough to kill, you&#039;re doing it wrong. ;0

Among the shallow areas that can be attacked with a knife are the jugular, thyroid, femoral artery, iliac artery, brachial plexus, and intestines.  Get any of those and your attacker doesn&#039;t have long.  Even a well-muscled fat guy has all those relatively close to the surface.

If your knife is sharp and you use it well, you can slash through just about anything.  A friend of mine is an instructor in a martial art that is primarily knife-based.  He recently did a series of tests using dummies swaddled in thick clothes and demonstrated that knives go right through with a slashing motion.  He attacked large cuts of meat as well to show how deep he cut.  Even went through bone pretty well.  He did it with large and small knives.

Bottom line is that gashes are much bigger wounds than stabs.  Poke a guy and he&#039;ll keep coming.  Leave bits of him hanging and he&#039;ll be too busy trying to scoop his innards back in to kill you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with Uncle on the cutting rather than stabbing.  I&#8217;m not sure why people think cuts can only be shallow and won&#8217;t reach vital places.  I suppose it&#8217;s possible that stabs go deeper, but if you&#8217;re cut isn&#8217;t deep enough to kill, you&#8217;re doing it wrong. ;0</p>
<p>Among the shallow areas that can be attacked with a knife are the jugular, thyroid, femoral artery, iliac artery, brachial plexus, and intestines.  Get any of those and your attacker doesn&#8217;t have long.  Even a well-muscled fat guy has all those relatively close to the surface.</p>
<p>If your knife is sharp and you use it well, you can slash through just about anything.  A friend of mine is an instructor in a martial art that is primarily knife-based.  He recently did a series of tests using dummies swaddled in thick clothes and demonstrated that knives go right through with a slashing motion.  He attacked large cuts of meat as well to show how deep he cut.  Even went through bone pretty well.  He did it with large and small knives.</p>
<p>Bottom line is that gashes are much bigger wounds than stabs.  Poke a guy and he&#8217;ll keep coming.  Leave bits of him hanging and he&#8217;ll be too busy trying to scoop his innards back in to kill you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guav</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108615</link>
		<dc:creator>Guav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108615</guid>
		<description>Knives (and guns) are only &quot;tactical&quot; and &quot;assault&quot; weapons if they have scary black handles. Wood is for &quot;legitimate&quot; use :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knives (and guns) are only &#8220;tactical&#8221; and &#8220;assault&#8221; weapons if they have scary black handles. Wood is for &#8220;legitimate&#8221; use <img src='http://www.saysuncle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tkdkerry</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108613</link>
		<dc:creator>tkdkerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 17:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108613</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The FBI is concerned because the blade easily flips out and can be used to attack an unsuspecting individual.&lt;/em&gt;

Oh, no! I&#039;ve got hands that can easily flip out and be used to attack an unsuspecting individual!  Knife hand, ridge hand, spear hand, punch, backfist, hammerfist, and oh wow that&#039;s just a few!  God help us all, we&#039;ve all got Assault Hands!  We must make them illegal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The FBI is concerned because the blade easily flips out and can be used to attack an unsuspecting individual.</em></p>
<p>Oh, no! I&#8217;ve got hands that can easily flip out and be used to attack an unsuspecting individual!  Knife hand, ridge hand, spear hand, punch, backfist, hammerfist, and oh wow that&#8217;s just a few!  God help us all, we&#8217;ve all got Assault Hands!  We must make them illegal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gattsuru</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108610</link>
		<dc:creator>gattsuru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 16:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108610</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;A brief interlude on knife fighting: you don’t stab, you cut. It’s easier for the recipient of said wound to fight back if they’re just plugging a hole than it is for them to fight back if they’re trying to hold their insides in.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

As always, location, location, location.

A slice wound tends to be faster and more likely to disable, particularly since even short knifes can get a decent tendon cut on the arms (which are also more exposed).  Slices are also generally much more painful, at least until you start poking into internal organs.

But stab wounds have their place.  A stab to the sternum is much more damaging than any slice to the chest would be with the same weapon. Stabs commit much more momentum, and are best aimed at normally well-guarded points of the torso and limbs.  But they&#039;re more likely to end a fight as opposed to just slowing down your enemy (admittedly, slowing down an enemy has its place : lets you run away).  A stab will easily hit kidneys or arteries when a slice would only cut skin or muscle.  There&#039;s a reason the Fairbairn-Sykes knife, used by the OSS and Marine Raiders through WWII, was a great stabbing instrument.  

Part depends on your grip : the &quot;cancer&quot; grip (modified forward grip with thumb pointing forward at targets) is useless for anything but stabbing, while most reverse grips will overcommit you if you attempt to stab with them.

Of course, if your opponent has a weapon himself, all of the above goes out the window.  In a weapon to weapon fight, you should first attempt to cause a minor wound then run, but if that&#039;s not possible, you should leave every possibility and technique open.  The only bad cut when someone&#039;s trying to kill you is one on your own body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>A brief interlude on knife fighting: you don’t stab, you cut. It’s easier for the recipient of said wound to fight back if they’re just plugging a hole than it is for them to fight back if they’re trying to hold their insides in.</p></blockquote>
<p>As always, location, location, location.</p>
<p>A slice wound tends to be faster and more likely to disable, particularly since even short knifes can get a decent tendon cut on the arms (which are also more exposed).  Slices are also generally much more painful, at least until you start poking into internal organs.</p>
<p>But stab wounds have their place.  A stab to the sternum is much more damaging than any slice to the chest would be with the same weapon. Stabs commit much more momentum, and are best aimed at normally well-guarded points of the torso and limbs.  But they&#8217;re more likely to end a fight as opposed to just slowing down your enemy (admittedly, slowing down an enemy has its place : lets you run away).  A stab will easily hit kidneys or arteries when a slice would only cut skin or muscle.  There&#8217;s a reason the Fairbairn-Sykes knife, used by the OSS and Marine Raiders through WWII, was a great stabbing instrument.  </p>
<p>Part depends on your grip : the &#8220;cancer&#8221; grip (modified forward grip with thumb pointing forward at targets) is useless for anything but stabbing, while most reverse grips will overcommit you if you attempt to stab with them.</p>
<p>Of course, if your opponent has a weapon himself, all of the above goes out the window.  In a weapon to weapon fight, you should first attempt to cause a minor wound then run, but if that&#8217;s not possible, you should leave every possibility and technique open.  The only bad cut when someone&#8217;s trying to kill you is one on your own body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108555</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108555</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;And my info is based on sooper seekrit but reliable sources. &lt;/em&gt;

lmao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>And my info is based on sooper seekrit but reliable sources. </em></p>
<p>lmao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108540</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108540</guid>
		<description>The WSJ was in on the act earlier.  It sounds like this is the first wave of an assault on the carrying knives and other tools.  Just last month we laughed at the silliness about knives coming out of Great Britain.

My post &lt;a href=&quot;http://ninthstage.com/index.php/2006/07/27/yet-more-knife-stories/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; links to the WSJ article posted at the high road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WSJ was in on the act earlier.  It sounds like this is the first wave of an assault on the carrying knives and other tools.  Just last month we laughed at the silliness about knives coming out of Great Britain.</p>
<p>My post <a href="http://ninthstage.com/index.php/2006/07/27/yet-more-knife-stories/" rel="nofollow">here</a> links to the WSJ article posted at the high road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108526</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108526</guid>
		<description>Well, they should ban them!

Worked in Sctoland, didn&#039;t it?

As for knife fights, bring a gun to one and you&#039;ll be OK. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, they should ban them!</p>
<p>Worked in Sctoland, didn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>As for knife fights, bring a gun to one and you&#8217;ll be OK. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KCSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108524</link>
		<dc:creator>KCSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108524</guid>
		<description>Check out the new US Knife &amp; Tool Association - http://www.uskta.org

It&#039;s intended to be the &#039;knife&#039; equivalent of the NRA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the new US Knife &amp; Tool Association &#8211; <a href="http://www.uskta.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.uskta.org</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s intended to be the &#8216;knife&#8217; equivalent of the NRA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beerslurpy</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108518</link>
		<dc:creator>beerslurpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108518</guid>
		<description>So is my info. Look at the ballistic wounds that stop an attack. A prime example of ineffectiveness is a birdshot wound- lots of surface damage (like a long knife slice) but no serious nerve damage and relatively little blood pressure drop. All the effective fight stoppers reach inside the body and sever major arteries and nerves. This is just as true of edged weapons as it is with projectiles. 

All the blood vessels on the surface of the body are capillaries and all the nerves are serving only that section of the body. Inflicting an incapacitating wound by damaging the outer surface of the body is notoriously ineffective at stopping a fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is my info. Look at the ballistic wounds that stop an attack. A prime example of ineffectiveness is a birdshot wound- lots of surface damage (like a long knife slice) but no serious nerve damage and relatively little blood pressure drop. All the effective fight stoppers reach inside the body and sever major arteries and nerves. This is just as true of edged weapons as it is with projectiles. </p>
<p>All the blood vessels on the surface of the body are capillaries and all the nerves are serving only that section of the body. Inflicting an incapacitating wound by damaging the outer surface of the body is notoriously ineffective at stopping a fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108517</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108517</guid>
		<description>Well, i&#039;m speaking more in terms of stopping an attack than killing.  And my info is based on sooper seekrit but reliable sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, i&#8217;m speaking more in terms of stopping an attack than killing.  And my info is based on sooper seekrit but reliable sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beerslurpy</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/comment-page-1/#comment-108516</link>
		<dc:creator>beerslurpy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 12:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/08/01/i_thought_it_was_just_the_brits_who_were_afraid_of_knives/#comment-108516</guid>
		<description>No, youre wrong about knife fighting. Cutting strokes are rarely fatal, the only exception being if they sever a limb or cut into the neck arteries. Pretty much all the major arteries, nerves and important organs are inside the body and must be reached by stabbing. The insides are held in very firmly by membranes and connective tissue and you will have a profoundly difficult time disembowling someone who can fight back. 

This was an important reason why the Roman legions were so effective in combat. They discovered how quickly fatal even a relatively shallow puncture wound could be and used it to great effect against armies who did not know this and kept using slashing and hacking strokes.

Then again, it is also easier to make a weapon of low grade steel that can kill by puncture than one that can kill by slashing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, youre wrong about knife fighting. Cutting strokes are rarely fatal, the only exception being if they sever a limb or cut into the neck arteries. Pretty much all the major arteries, nerves and important organs are inside the body and must be reached by stabbing. The insides are held in very firmly by membranes and connective tissue and you will have a profoundly difficult time disembowling someone who can fight back. </p>
<p>This was an important reason why the Roman legions were so effective in combat. They discovered how quickly fatal even a relatively shallow puncture wound could be and used it to great effect against armies who did not know this and kept using slashing and hacking strokes.</p>
<p>Then again, it is also easier to make a weapon of low grade steel that can kill by puncture than one that can kill by slashing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

