<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The political process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/07/21/the_political_process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/07/21/the_political_process/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:55:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brutal Hugger</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/07/21/the_political_process/comment-page-1/#comment-104335</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutal Hugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/07/21/the_political_process/#comment-104335</guid>
		<description>That includes appointed federal judges, i.e. Supreme Court judges, who are tenured for life.  At that point, it&#039;s not self interest, it&#039;s just stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That includes appointed federal judges, i.e. Supreme Court judges, who are tenured for life.  At that point, it&#8217;s not self interest, it&#8217;s just stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe public</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/07/21/the_political_process/comment-page-1/#comment-104327</link>
		<dc:creator>joe public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/07/21/the_political_process/#comment-104327</guid>
		<description>BH, maybe that&#039;s because most judicial elections are partisan, so the judges are in on the game.  Maybe not, but it has to figure somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BH, maybe that&#8217;s because most judicial elections are partisan, so the judges are in on the game.  Maybe not, but it has to figure somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brutal Hugger</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/07/21/the_political_process/comment-page-1/#comment-104287</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutal Hugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/07/21/the_political_process/#comment-104287</guid>
		<description>What I hate is the way courts have consistently held that the two parties are allowed to make laws whose sole purpose is to protect the two-party system, even if it makes third party viability virtually impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I hate is the way courts have consistently held that the two parties are allowed to make laws whose sole purpose is to protect the two-party system, even if it makes third party viability virtually impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
