<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Man with a plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/07/10/man_with_a_plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/07/10/man_with_a_plan/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:23:22 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AughtSix</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/07/10/man_with_a_plan/comment-page-1/#comment-99953</link>
		<dc:creator>AughtSix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/07/10/man_with_a_plan/#comment-99953</guid>
		<description>The Hughes Amendment is going to be a tough one... &quot;you&#039;re going to make &lt;em&gt;machine guns&lt;/em&gt; legal?!?!&quot; But, with all the misrepresnetation on the assault weapons as machine guns, the antis have, to some extent, shot their load already. So, as hard as it might be, if we&#039;re going to do it it won&#039;t be any easier than while &quot;assault weapons&quot; are still being discussed and called machine guns. (Well, barring some really strange election results, anyway)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hughes Amendment is going to be a tough one&#8230; &#8220;you&#8217;re going to make <em>machine guns</em> legal?!?!&#8221; But, with all the misrepresnetation on the assault weapons as machine guns, the antis have, to some extent, shot their load already. So, as hard as it might be, if we&#8217;re going to do it it won&#8217;t be any easier than while &#8220;assault weapons&#8221; are still being discussed and called machine guns. (Well, barring some really strange election results, anyway)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/07/10/man_with_a_plan/comment-page-1/#comment-99834</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/07/10/man_with_a_plan/#comment-99834</guid>
		<description>I agree with Publicola&#039;s sentiment, but we&#039;d be expending a boatload of political capital just getting rid of the Hughes Amendment.  Just doing #5 is going to take a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Publicola&#8217;s sentiment, but we&#8217;d be expending a boatload of political capital just getting rid of the Hughes Amendment.  Just doing #5 is going to take a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AughtSix</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/07/10/man_with_a_plan/comment-page-1/#comment-99817</link>
		<dc:creator>AughtSix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/07/10/man_with_a_plan/#comment-99817</guid>
		<description>Not to be snarky, but of course Publicola doesn&#039;t think the plan is enough. It&#039;s an incremental step (or steps) rather than the whole enchilada. 

Personally, I think it&#039;s a great goal for now, and if we could get even &lt;em&gt;most&lt;/em&gt; of the points between now and, say, &#039;08, we&#039;ve done well. The point of the list isn&#039;t to restore the 2nd ammendment to a point where the founders would recognize it, but rather to take advantage of the relative strength of the pro-gun side now, so that when the pendulum swings back the otherway (whenever that happens, and you know it inevitably will), we aren&#039;t so screwed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to be snarky, but of course Publicola doesn&#8217;t think the plan is enough. It&#8217;s an incremental step (or steps) rather than the whole enchilada. </p>
<p>Personally, I think it&#8217;s a great goal for now, and if we could get even <em>most</em> of the points between now and, say, &#8216;08, we&#8217;ve done well. The point of the list isn&#8217;t to restore the 2nd ammendment to a point where the founders would recognize it, but rather to take advantage of the relative strength of the pro-gun side now, so that when the pendulum swings back the otherway (whenever that happens, and you know it inevitably will), we aren&#8217;t so screwed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
