Comments on: KT Ordnance update

By: BOB

BOB — Tue, 11 Jul 2006 00:16:20 +0000

Hey, the DEA operates in Canada so why not?

By: Sigivald

Sigivald — Mon, 10 Jul 2006 23:48:19 +0000

I’m extremely dubious in the absence of non-crazy-ass corroborations. An anonymous report from FMN, stating only “reportedly”, not even “according to [description or name of source]“? And Infowars? Saints preserve us.

Of course, I’m also inclined to believe anyone distributing Alex Jones films is enough of an idiot to do any sort of illegal or stupid thing, but that’s just me.

(Also, what’s “Canadian AFT”? Google doesn’t think any such agency exists… maybe it’s double super info-wars secret!

And I believe you’re right, Alcibiades … about NAFTA not actually containing any such provision. Certainly a search of its text for “law enforcement” and “police” suggests nothing.

Though I suspect the FBI can legally allow Canadian cops to be present and communicate with them without NAFTA being involved. Though why that would be of any use is uncertain, since the FBI can manage extradition without their help…)

By: robert

robert — Mon, 10 Jul 2006 02:49:29 +0000

Every day, like George Washington, we get the choice between slavery and rebellion.

By: beerslurpy

beerslurpy — Sun, 09 Jul 2006 21:27:32 +0000

Theyre just trying to harass him and make him spend money on lawyers.

By: SayUncle

SayUncle — Sun, 09 Jul 2006 19:22:51 +0000

Well, 80%ers don’t usually have serial numbers.

By: Alcibiades

Alcibiades — Sun, 09 Jul 2006 19:00:24 +0000

I heard that, because of NAFTA, law enforcement from each participating country can make arrests of suspects within 50 miles of the border. However, I just read this on some blog (in the context of illegal immigration and Mexican government interference) so it probably may not be true.

I’d be interested in finding out how the Canadian government learned that those guns were used in crimes. Did he list some serial numbers and it turns out they matched?