<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RETREAT!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/06/07/retreat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/06/07/retreat/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:57:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/06/07/retreat/comment-page-1/#comment-88098</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=8735#comment-88098</guid>
		<description>Now I know that NRA has a bad habit of leaving SAF out of releases when they are partnered, but this is a little frustrating, too.  SAF is &lt;i&gt;implying&lt;/i&gt; that their call for an investigation triggered the retreat.  According to NRA News, they were already following up on word that he was backtracking before their release came out.  While NRA (public affairs, not NRA News - very different divisions) should have shared more credit with SAF in the initial press, SAF shouldn&#039;t be trying to claim credit for making him rethink his statements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I know that NRA has a bad habit of leaving SAF out of releases when they are partnered, but this is a little frustrating, too.  SAF is <i>implying</i> that their call for an investigation triggered the retreat.  According to NRA News, they were already following up on word that he was backtracking before their release came out.  While NRA (public affairs, not NRA News &#8211; very different divisions) should have shared more credit with SAF in the initial press, SAF shouldn&#8217;t be trying to claim credit for making him rethink his statements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

