Comments on: More on gun confiscation bans http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:09:31 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: wrangler5 http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/comment-page-1/#comment-71301 wrangler5 Sat, 29 Apr 2006 22:06:09 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/#comment-71301 tkdkerry is right. The "authorities" who order gun confiscations do so believing that guns are threats to "law enforcement." Any injury to "law enforcement" during confiscation efforts simply reinforces their original belief. The best resistance would be to disable the "law enforcement" people with a hammer or a lead pipe, not a gun, but that probably is not going to be very practical tkdkerry is right. The “authorities” who order gun confiscations do so believing that guns are threats to “law enforcement.” Any injury to “law enforcement” during confiscation efforts simply reinforces their original belief.

The best resistance would be to disable the “law enforcement” people with a hammer or a lead pipe, not a gun, but that probably is not going to be very practical

]]> By: tkdkerry http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/comment-page-1/#comment-71124 tkdkerry Fri, 28 Apr 2006 22:08:07 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/#comment-71124 <i>One or two stand-offs or a bunch of wounded officers is (hopefully) going to cause some some bureaucrats to get their heads out of their asses and reconsider the consequences of putting people’s lives in danger versus allowing law-abiding citizens to keep and maintain their only means of protection.</i> Hopefully is right. Methinks it's much more likely that the b-crats will see any resistance as proof positive that guns need to be seized, and will result in many gun-owners shot without hesitation. Don't forget, the people that want to do this stuff are thinking backwards... why would they change and suddenly become logical? One or two stand-offs or a bunch of wounded officers is (hopefully) going to cause some some bureaucrats to get their heads out of their asses and reconsider the consequences of putting people’s lives in danger versus allowing law-abiding citizens to keep and maintain their only means of protection.

Hopefully is right. Methinks it’s much more likely that the b-crats will see any resistance as proof positive that guns need to be seized, and will result in many gun-owners shot without hesitation. Don’t forget, the people that want to do this stuff are thinking backwards… why would they change and suddenly become logical?

]]> By: Standard Mischief http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/comment-page-1/#comment-71077 Standard Mischief Fri, 28 Apr 2006 12:18:46 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/#comment-71077 http://www.channeloklahoma.com/news/9023840/detail.html "OKLAHOMA CITY -- An Oklahoma legislator said he hopes to make some changes to a new law that makes it illegal for authorities to confiscate weapons during a state of emergency. ... House Bill 2696 ..." The dateline was Apr 26. http://www.channeloklahoma.com/news/9023840/detail.html

“OKLAHOMA CITY — An Oklahoma legislator said he hopes to make some changes to a new law that makes it illegal for authorities to confiscate weapons during a state of emergency.

…

House Bill 2696

…”

The dateline was Apr 26.

]]> By: Marc http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/comment-page-1/#comment-71067 Marc Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:34:46 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/#comment-71067 I think the Arizona was narrowly <em>not</em> overidden. I think the Arizona was narrowly not overidden.

]]> By: dave http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/comment-page-1/#comment-71036 dave Fri, 28 Apr 2006 06:08:51 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/#comment-71036 I think if another disaster strikes and there's an attempt to forcibly remove people's rightly-owned weapons, there are going to be some devastating results. Putting much-needed manpower to work confiscating legal possessions and consequently putting their lives at risk was as asinine a move as I've ever seen a State government making. One or two stand-offs or a bunch of wounded officers is (hopefully) going to cause some some bureaucrats to get their heads out of their asses and reconsider the consequences of putting people's lives in danger versus allowing law-abiding citizens to keep and maintain their only means of protection. I think if another disaster strikes and there’s an attempt to forcibly remove people’s rightly-owned weapons, there are going to be some devastating results. Putting much-needed manpower to work confiscating legal possessions and consequently putting their lives at risk was as asinine a move as I’ve ever seen a State government making. One or two stand-offs or a bunch of wounded officers is (hopefully) going to cause some some bureaucrats to get their heads out of their asses and reconsider the consequences of putting people’s lives in danger versus allowing law-abiding citizens to keep and maintain their only means of protection.

]]> By: beerslurpy http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/comment-page-1/#comment-71016 beerslurpy Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:54:27 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/28/more_on_gun_confiscation_bans/#comment-71016 The police will only need to worry about my guns if they try and snatch them. Such an easy problem to solve! Dont waste sparse manpower during a crisis by turning nervous homeowners into heavily armed criminals! Police are supposed to HELP citizens, not kick them when they are down. The police will only need to worry about my guns if they try and snatch them.

Such an easy problem to solve! Dont waste sparse manpower during a crisis by turning nervous homeowners into heavily armed criminals! Police are supposed to HELP citizens, not kick them when they are down.

]]>