<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberals and guns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/17/liberals_and_guns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/17/liberals_and_guns/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:05:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron W</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/17/liberals_and_guns/comment-page-1/#comment-67521</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/17/liberals_and_guns/#comment-67521</guid>
		<description>Here are a couple of other liberals for liberty who agreed with you, F-Stop, and for the real reason for the 2nd Amendment:


&quot;Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no 
matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear 
arms.... The right of citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against 
arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote 
in America but which historically has proven to be always possible.&quot; 
-- Senator Hubert H. Humphrey 


&quot;By calling attention to &#039;a well regulated militia&#039;, the &#039;security&#039; of the 
nation, and the right of each citizen &#039;to keep and bear arms&#039;, our founding 
fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is 
extremely unlikely that the fears of governmental tyranny which gave rise to 
the Second Amendment will ever be a major danger to our nation, the Amendment 
still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military 
relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of 
his country. For that reason, I believe the Second Amendment will always be 
important.&quot; --John F. Kennedy, April 1960</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are a couple of other liberals for liberty who agreed with you, F-Stop, and for the real reason for the 2nd Amendment:</p>
<p>&#8220;Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no<br />
matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear<br />
arms&#8230;. The right of citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against<br />
arbitrary government, one more safeguard against the tyranny which now appears remote<br />
in America but which historically has proven to be always possible.&#8221;<br />
&#8211; Senator Hubert H. Humphrey </p>
<p>&#8220;By calling attention to &#8216;a well regulated militia&#8217;, the &#8216;security&#8217; of the<br />
nation, and the right of each citizen &#8216;to keep and bear arms&#8217;, our founding<br />
fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is<br />
extremely unlikely that the fears of governmental tyranny which gave rise to<br />
the Second Amendment will ever be a major danger to our nation, the Amendment<br />
still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military<br />
relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of<br />
his country. For that reason, I believe the Second Amendment will always be<br />
important.&#8221; &#8211;John F. Kennedy, April 1960</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F-Stop</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/17/liberals_and_guns/comment-page-1/#comment-67506</link>
		<dc:creator>F-Stop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/17/liberals_and_guns/#comment-67506</guid>
		<description>Liberal, gun owner here. I totally agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal, gun owner here. I totally agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron W</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/17/liberals_and_guns/comment-page-1/#comment-67318</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/17/liberals_and_guns/#comment-67318</guid>
		<description>Aunt B. is right on! True liberals, in that the term derives from liberty (to the people) should support the RIGHT to keep AND CARRY the means of self-defense.

As a liberal Supreme Court Jusitce once said,

&quot;The closest the framers came to the affirmative side of liberty was in the right of the people to bear arms.&quot; --William O. Douglas, 1963</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aunt B. is right on! True liberals, in that the term derives from liberty (to the people) should support the RIGHT to keep AND CARRY the means of self-defense.</p>
<p>As a liberal Supreme Court Jusitce once said,</p>
<p>&#8220;The closest the framers came to the affirmative side of liberty was in the right of the people to bear arms.&#8221; &#8211;William O. Douglas, 1963</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

