Comments on: Pussies http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/12/pussies/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:33:21 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: SayUncle » Yup, they’re pussies http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/12/pussies/comment-page-1/#comment-66566 SayUncle » Yup, they’re pussies Thu, 13 Apr 2006 17:36:21 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/12/pussies/#comment-66566 [...] In an update to this, looks like Comedy Central did censor Mohammed. [...] [...] In an update to this, looks like Comedy Central did censor Mohammed. [...]

]]> By: Manish http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/12/pussies/comment-page-1/#comment-66519 Manish Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:24:33 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/12/pussies/#comment-66519 My guess is that if CC has the ability to quash am image of Mohammed, then CC has the ability to quash a note appearing about the incident. As such, I would assume that it was meant to be a joke. My guess is that if CC has the ability to quash am image of Mohammed, then CC has the ability to quash a note appearing about the incident. As such, I would assume that it was meant to be a joke.

]]> By: SayUncle http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/12/pussies/comment-page-1/#comment-66480 SayUncle Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:58:02 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/12/pussies/#comment-66480 I'm saying they showed muhammed in an old episode called super best friends. I’m saying they showed muhammed in an old episode called super best friends.

]]> By: Xrlq http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/12/pussies/comment-page-1/#comment-66479 Xrlq Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:56:56 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/12/pussies/#comment-66479 Oops, I misread your post. Are you saying there was a Part 2 after all, but it didn't show Mohammed? Even so, I'd like to think this was just a variation on the same joke. Oops, I misread your post. Are you saying there was a Part 2 after all, but it didn’t show Mohammed? Even so, I’d like to think this was just a variation on the same joke.

]]> By: Xrlq http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/12/pussies/comment-page-1/#comment-66478 Xrlq Thu, 13 Apr 2006 12:55:21 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/12/pussies/#comment-66478 I'm pretty sure it was a joke. There never was meant to be a Part 2; it was just a dig at CC for having wimped out on re-running the Trapped in the Closet episode. Was last night's episode a re-run? If not, them I'm *certain* there was never supposed to be a Part 2. These guys never have a show ready to go a week before it is scheduled to air. I’m pretty sure it was a joke. There never was meant to be a Part 2; it was just a dig at CC for having wimped out on re-running the Trapped in the Closet episode.

Was last night’s episode a re-run? If not, them I’m *certain* there was never supposed to be a Part 2. These guys never have a show ready to go a week before it is scheduled to air.

]]> By: Josh http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/04/12/pussies/comment-page-1/#comment-66331 Josh Thu, 13 Apr 2006 05:58:03 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/04/12/pussies/#comment-66331 I'm pretty sure that was tongue-in-cheek. I think it was more about how political correctness runs rampant than actually showing Muhammed. The whole First Amendment speech by the President to the press corps - "When did your administration come up with this 'First Amendment'?" - and how you can make fun of everything or nothing. I don't know. I was pissed at first, then I thought about it about midway thru an angry post. I’m pretty sure that was tongue-in-cheek. I think it was more about how political correctness runs rampant than actually showing Muhammed. The whole First Amendment speech by the President to the press corps – “When did your administration come up with this ‘First Amendment’?” – and how you can make fun of everything or nothing. I don’t know. I was pissed at first, then I thought about it about midway thru an angry post.

]]>