Comments on: Metropulse and ED

By: Property Rights

Property Rights — Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:25:52 +0000

There is a history of eminent domain abuse at KCDC.

You can read more here:

http://www.propertyrightsknox.blogspot.com/

By: persimmon

persimmon — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:17:53 +0000

There sure is. The Metro Pulse “hit piece” discussed that distinction. So did the Supreme Court when deciding the Kelo case.

There is also a distinction between legitimate criticism of an editorial position and unsupported allegations of conflicts of interest. If you or Terry Frank have any evidence of Conley or the city abusing eminent domain, let’s hear it. If you have counterpoints to arguments made in that editorial, let’s hear them.

If all you have is empty sensationalism, saddle up and alert the press to your noble protestations!

By: SayUncle

SayUncle — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:03:22 +0000

Persimmon, There’s a distinction between legitimate public use and abuse.

By: persimmon

persimmon — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:58:18 +0000

You all should boycott all things associated with this “hideous” practice. Saddle up the horse and stock up on candles! Voluntarily pay higher taxes so governments are not tempted to rehab and revitalize to increase revenues! Let the revolution begin!

By: Tam

Tam — Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:27:14 +0000

You misspelled “Metropus”.