<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scout Rifles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:00:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/comment-page-1/#comment-59137</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/#comment-59137</guid>
		<description>Leverguns, as much as I like them, are also slow to reload. A good scout should accept either clips or detactable mags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leverguns, as much as I like them, are also slow to reload. A good scout should accept either clips or detactable mags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alston</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/comment-page-1/#comment-59136</link>
		<dc:creator>Alston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/#comment-59136</guid>
		<description>Levergun actions are also more fragile, and complicated than bolt actions.

If I could make my short handy little Rermington 600 scout semi-auto without it being any heavier or longer, sure, but right now, at 6.5 pounds, I just can&#039;t see the added advantage for a rifle that&#039;s not for head-on battlefield use. It puts .308 in a nice neat group out to 300yd.

Not all scout style rifles are $2400 Steyrs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Levergun actions are also more fragile, and complicated than bolt actions.</p>
<p>If I could make my short handy little Rermington 600 scout semi-auto without it being any heavier or longer, sure, but right now, at 6.5 pounds, I just can&#8217;t see the added advantage for a rifle that&#8217;s not for head-on battlefield use. It puts .308 in a nice neat group out to 300yd.</p>
<p>Not all scout style rifles are $2400 Steyrs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EgregiousCharles</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/comment-page-1/#comment-58920</link>
		<dc:creator>EgregiousCharles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 03:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/#comment-58920</guid>
		<description>I can see the prone issue with leverguns, but doesn&#039;t the Browning BLR meet the weight criteria, even with a laminate stock?  If you ignore the prone, especially the bipod, the BLR seems like a superior starting point in every way.  And if you don&#039;t mind being high enough on your bipod to change an assault rifle magazine, then the bipod isn&#039;t even all that bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the prone issue with leverguns, but doesn&#8217;t the Browning BLR meet the weight criteria, even with a laminate stock?  If you ignore the prone, especially the bipod, the BLR seems like a superior starting point in every way.  And if you don&#8217;t mind being high enough on your bipod to change an assault rifle magazine, then the bipod isn&#8217;t even all that bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/comment-page-1/#comment-58915</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 01:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/#comment-58915</guid>
		<description>RE: Scout. I dunno....For general all-&#039;round handiness, I keep reaching into the boom bin and pulling out the Savage 10 Scout.  I&#039;d prefer the Leupold was a 4X rather than 2.5, another few rounds in the magazine would be nice, but it was $200 used, another 150 for the scope and QD mount; it&#039;s light, always works, weather doesn&#039;t faze the syn stock, groups well out to as far as I can see to hit stuff, and likes M1A food, which works on most everything. 

Seems to work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Scout. I dunno&#8230;.For general all-&#8217;round handiness, I keep reaching into the boom bin and pulling out the Savage 10 Scout.  I&#8217;d prefer the Leupold was a 4X rather than 2.5, another few rounds in the magazine would be nice, but it was $200 used, another 150 for the scope and QD mount; it&#8217;s light, always works, weather doesn&#8217;t faze the syn stock, groups well out to as far as I can see to hit stuff, and likes M1A food, which works on most everything. </p>
<p>Seems to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/comment-page-1/#comment-58658</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/#comment-58658</guid>
		<description>...because the number of semiauto or lever action rifles chambered in a .308-class round that meet the weight criteria is pretty much zilch.

The bolt gun still has a lot to recommend it in compactness, simplicity, and ruggedness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;because the number of semiauto or lever action rifles chambered in a .308-class round that meet the weight criteria is pretty much zilch.</p>
<p>The bolt gun still has a lot to recommend it in compactness, simplicity, and ruggedness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/comment-page-1/#comment-58655</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/#comment-58655</guid>
		<description>Uncle, he had a hand in it, apparently because Stery were the ones who were interested in the concept back when. I guess if Kel-Tec had hopped on the bandwagon instead that scout rifles would have been a lot cheaper. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uncle, he had a hand in it, apparently because Stery were the ones who were interested in the concept back when. I guess if Kel-Tec had hopped on the bandwagon instead that scout rifles would have been a lot cheaper. <img src='http://www.saysuncle.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GunGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/comment-page-1/#comment-58654</link>
		<dc:creator>GunGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/#comment-58654</guid>
		<description>I can understand the ruling out of lever actions. Just exactly how convenient is a lever gun with a bipod?

The Scout Rifle concept was for military as well as civilian use and a lever action just doesn&#039;t fit in well with prone shooting for either use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the ruling out of lever actions. Just exactly how convenient is a lever gun with a bipod?</p>
<p>The Scout Rifle concept was for military as well as civilian use and a lever action just doesn&#8217;t fit in well with prone shooting for either use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/comment-page-1/#comment-58645</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/#comment-58645</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but I thought cooper helped design the Steyr?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but I thought cooper helped design the Steyr?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/comment-page-1/#comment-58644</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/03/13/scout_rifles/#comment-58644</guid>
		<description>FWIW, Cooper never said it had to be a bolt action. It&#039;s just hard to get a semi-auto in a large caliber down to the weight he specified.

He also never specified the price. The Stery Scout is expensive because Steyrs are expensive, and because it came with a nice piece of glass. The Savage version was five bills or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, Cooper never said it had to be a bolt action. It&#8217;s just hard to get a semi-auto in a large caliber down to the weight he specified.</p>
<p>He also never specified the price. The Stery Scout is expensive because Steyrs are expensive, and because it came with a nice piece of glass. The Savage version was five bills or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
