<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote of the Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/02/17/quote_of_the_day-47/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/02/17/quote_of_the_day-47/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:33:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Addison</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/02/17/quote_of_the_day-47/comment-page-1/#comment-53531</link>
		<dc:creator>Addison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 21:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/02/17/quote_of_the_day-47/#comment-53531</guid>
		<description>(Psst, Uncle.. I think he was quoting the &quot;insane party out of power&quot;, not that that was his case)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Psst, Uncle.. I think he was quoting the &#8220;insane party out of power&#8221;, not that that was his case)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/02/17/quote_of_the_day-47/comment-page-1/#comment-53526</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/02/17/quote_of_the_day-47/#comment-53526</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;he stole the election, he didn’t get the majority of the popular vote&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The majority doesn&#039;t elect the president. The Electoral College does. Been that way for years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>he stole the election, he didn’t get the majority of the popular vote</p></blockquote>
<p>The majority doesn&#8217;t elect the president. The Electoral College does. Been that way for years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/02/17/quote_of_the_day-47/comment-page-1/#comment-53525</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/02/17/quote_of_the_day-47/#comment-53525</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;However, may I make an observation? This is 2006, it took 5 years, and 4 months for her to make that point.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Not to be that guy (and it doesn&#039;t take anything away from the rest of your argument, but Megan published Jane&#039;s law back on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.janegalt.net/blog/archives/004185.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;May 21, 2003&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;However, may I make an observation? This is 2006, it took 5 years, and 4 months for her to make that point.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Not to be that guy (and it doesn&#8217;t take anything away from the rest of your argument, but Megan published Jane&#8217;s law back on <a href="http://www.janegalt.net/blog/archives/004185.html" rel="nofollow">May 21, 2003</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wickedpinto</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/02/17/quote_of_the_day-47/comment-page-1/#comment-53438</link>
		<dc:creator>Wickedpinto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/02/17/quote_of_the_day-47/#comment-53438</guid>
		<description>Well, that article has a lot of value and it&#039;s true.

However, may I make an observation?  This is 2006, it took 5 years, and 4 months for her to make that point.  5 years and 4 months of daily assaults, and insults on the President because, at first, he stole the election, he didn&#039;t get the majority of the popular vote, who was he to take credit for &quot;no child left behind&quot; when everyone knew it would have never passed had it not been for Kennedy being the true author.(it was painted as a kennedy bill, not a Bush one when it was passed)  In 1992, the right said much of the same things, but they said something along these lines &quot;Perot stole the election for clinton&quot; &quot;Clinton is the first president in 20 + years to have less than a majority of the vote.&quot;

I&#039;m not saying that during the tenure of Clinton the &#039;pubs did a good job (though legislatively, in general, they did) nor am I saying that the dem&#039;s are all obstructionists, they aren&#039;t though there are examples where it looks true.  What I am saying is that the Dem&#039;s using the same arguments in November of 2000, that the pub&#039;s used in November of 1992 are different, contextually.

Other than that, when given only two choices, the voices of those choices, tend to be extreme. . . .duh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that article has a lot of value and it&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>However, may I make an observation?  This is 2006, it took 5 years, and 4 months for her to make that point.  5 years and 4 months of daily assaults, and insults on the President because, at first, he stole the election, he didn&#8217;t get the majority of the popular vote, who was he to take credit for &#8220;no child left behind&#8221; when everyone knew it would have never passed had it not been for Kennedy being the true author.(it was painted as a kennedy bill, not a Bush one when it was passed)  In 1992, the right said much of the same things, but they said something along these lines &#8220;Perot stole the election for clinton&#8221; &#8220;Clinton is the first president in 20 + years to have less than a majority of the vote.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that during the tenure of Clinton the &#8216;pubs did a good job (though legislatively, in general, they did) nor am I saying that the dem&#8217;s are all obstructionists, they aren&#8217;t though there are examples where it looks true.  What I am saying is that the Dem&#8217;s using the same arguments in November of 2000, that the pub&#8217;s used in November of 1992 are different, contextually.</p>
<p>Other than that, when given only two choices, the voices of those choices, tend to be extreme. . . .duh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
