<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alito bit of this, Alito bit of that</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/01/31/alito_bit_of_this_alito_bit_of_that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/01/31/alito_bit_of_this_alito_bit_of_that/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:42:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/01/31/alito_bit_of_this_alito_bit_of_that/comment-page-1/#comment-49571</link>
		<dc:creator>tgirsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/01/31/alito_bit_of_this_alito_bit_of_that/#comment-49571</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been meaning to blog this, but it should tell us a great deal about public opinion that admitting to not being pro-choice is a kiss of death for any judicial appointment.  And in a larger sense, whether you believe it&#039;s right or wrong, the originalist/strict constructionist interpretation of the constituion must be &lt;i&gt;supremely&lt;/i&gt; unpopular.  If it weren&#039;t, a nominee could proudly proclaim those beliefs and not jeopardize his or her nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to blog this, but it should tell us a great deal about public opinion that admitting to not being pro-choice is a kiss of death for any judicial appointment.  And in a larger sense, whether you believe it&#8217;s right or wrong, the originalist/strict constructionist interpretation of the constituion must be <i>supremely</i> unpopular.  If it weren&#8217;t, a nominee could proudly proclaim those beliefs and not jeopardize his or her nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brutal Hugger</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2006/01/31/alito_bit_of_this_alito_bit_of_that/comment-page-1/#comment-49565</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutal Hugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/01/31/alito_bit_of_this_alito_bit_of_that/#comment-49565</guid>
		<description>Well, the one thing we know is that he&#039;ll say anything to get the job.  He&#039;s a liar.  And that&#039;s not code for anything.

My guess is he&#039;s more right-wing than most Americans, but what else do you expect with a right-wing president and a right-wing Senate and a right-wing Congress?  This is what we elected, and the courts will follow.  I think we&#039;ll regret it.

Gridlock is good, and we shouldn&#039;t have all three branches, including both houses of Congress, all tilting to the right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the one thing we know is that he&#8217;ll say anything to get the job.  He&#8217;s a liar.  And that&#8217;s not code for anything.</p>
<p>My guess is he&#8217;s more right-wing than most Americans, but what else do you expect with a right-wing president and a right-wing Senate and a right-wing Congress?  This is what we elected, and the courts will follow.  I think we&#8217;ll regret it.</p>
<p>Gridlock is good, and we shouldn&#8217;t have all three branches, including both houses of Congress, all tilting to the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

