<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/09/poll_results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/09/poll_results/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:37:24 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heartless Libertarian</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/09/poll_results/comment-page-1/#comment-35581</link>
		<dc:creator>Heartless Libertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2005 02:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/11/09/poll_results/#comment-35581</guid>
		<description>Is &#039;sporting use&#039; even law?  I was under the impression that the only place &#039;sporting use&#039; is mentioned is in an executive order from Bush I.

If I&#039;d known about the poll (how did I miss it?) I would have voted for this, since it helps to reinforce the whole myth that the 2A is about &#039;sporting purposes.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8217;sporting use&#8217; even law?  I was under the impression that the only place &#8217;sporting use&#8217; is mentioned is in an executive order from Bush I.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;d known about the poll (how did I miss it?) I would have voted for this, since it helps to reinforce the whole myth that the 2A is about &#8217;sporting purposes.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Nuclear Strikes</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/09/poll_results/comment-page-1/#comment-35486</link>
		<dc:creator>Random Nuclear Strikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/11/09/poll_results/#comment-35486</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Have Gun, Will Travel&lt;/strong&gt;

Say Uncle links to a poll taken of firearms owners in the Gun Law News which asks which direction should the pro-2A groups head next. The Results: Nationwide CCW Reciprocity 43.5% Repeal of NFA 34 28.4% Repeal of ?sporting use?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Have Gun, Will Travel</strong></p>
<p>Say Uncle links to a poll taken of firearms owners in the Gun Law News which asks which direction should the pro-2A groups head next. The Results: Nationwide CCW Reciprocity 43.5% Repeal of NFA 34 28.4% Repeal of ?sporting use?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/09/poll_results/comment-page-1/#comment-35483</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/11/09/poll_results/#comment-35483</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s my humble opinion that many of the poll responders read &quot;Nationwide CCW&quot; and may not have realized that the poll was talking about RECIPROCITY.  Nationwide CCW Reciprocity won&#039;t help poor guys like me in IL, WI, KS, and NE.  

I&#039;d much rather see the NFA repealed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s my humble opinion that many of the poll responders read &#8220;Nationwide CCW&#8221; and may not have realized that the poll was talking about RECIPROCITY.  Nationwide CCW Reciprocity won&#8217;t help poor guys like me in IL, WI, KS, and NE.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d much rather see the NFA repealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
