<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Machine Gun Sammy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:08:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: damnum absque injuria &#187; Sammy &#8220;The Bull&#8221; Alito, Lone Dissenter</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/comment-page-1/#comment-33740</link>
		<dc:creator>damnum absque injuria &#187; Sammy &#8220;The Bull&#8221; Alito, Lone Dissenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/#comment-33740</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Uncle, the Brady Campaign to Prevent [Lawful] Gun Violence [in Self-Defense] rails against Samuel &#8220;Ilito&#8221; for &#8220;favor[ing] legal machine guns.&#8221; They also quote, without noting the irony, &#8220;Jim Brady, chair of the Brady Campaign,&#8221; while declining to offer any dissenting views from Xrlq, chair of the Xrlq Campaign, or anyone else pretentious enough to name a campaign after himself. Regarding Alito&#8217;s dissent in U.S. v. Rybar, 103 F.3d 273 (3d Cir. 1996) they also offer this gem: In 1996, Judge Samuel Alito was the sole judge who dissented from his Third Circuit Court of Appeals colleagues when they upheld the authority of Congress to ban fully automatic machine guns. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Uncle, the Brady Campaign to Prevent [Lawful] Gun Violence [in Self-Defense] rails against Samuel &#8220;Ilito&#8221; for &#8220;favor[ing] legal machine guns.&#8221; They also quote, without noting the irony, &#8220;Jim Brady, chair of the Brady Campaign,&#8221; while declining to offer any dissenting views from Xrlq, chair of the Xrlq Campaign, or anyone else pretentious enough to name a campaign after himself. Regarding Alito&#8217;s dissent in U.S. v. Rybar, 103 F.3d 273 (3d Cir. 1996) they also offer this gem: In 1996, Judge Samuel Alito was the sole judge who dissented from his Third Circuit Court of Appeals colleagues when they upheld the authority of Congress to ban fully automatic machine guns. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/comment-page-1/#comment-33607</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 18:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/#comment-33607</guid>
		<description>I love how Alito did not merely dissent in that case, he was the &lt;i&gt;sole&lt;/i&gt; judge who dissented.  As if there were some way two or more judges could have dissented on a three-judge panel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how Alito did not merely dissent in that case, he was the <i>sole</i> judge who dissented.  As if there were some way two or more judges could have dissented on a three-judge panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heartless Libertarian</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/comment-page-1/#comment-33606</link>
		<dc:creator>Heartless Libertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 18:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/#comment-33606</guid>
		<description>Oh, and while, according to the law, the AK-47 and the Uzi are legally machineguns, they do not meet the technical definition of such.

The AK-47 is an assault rifle.  The Uzi is a submachinegun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and while, according to the law, the AK-47 and the Uzi are legally machineguns, they do not meet the technical definition of such.</p>
<p>The AK-47 is an assault rifle.  The Uzi is a submachinegun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heartless Libertarian</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/comment-page-1/#comment-33605</link>
		<dc:creator>Heartless Libertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 18:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/#comment-33605</guid>
		<description>Actually, there is no general federal prohibition on possession of machineguns.  Only a prohibition on possessing &lt;em&gt;unregistered&lt;/em&gt; machineguns, or machineguns made after 1986.  IIRC, the case they&#039;re referencing concerned a machinegun (I think actually another home-built, just like in &lt;em&gt;Stewart&lt;/em&gt;) made after 1986.

Once again, the Bradys are either ignorant of the law, or deliberately lying and distorting for to scare the sheeple as much as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there is no general federal prohibition on possession of machineguns.  Only a prohibition on possessing <em>unregistered</em> machineguns, or machineguns made after 1986.  IIRC, the case they&#8217;re referencing concerned a machinegun (I think actually another home-built, just like in <em>Stewart</em>) made after 1986.</p>
<p>Once again, the Bradys are either ignorant of the law, or deliberately lying and distorting for to scare the sheeple as much as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/comment-page-1/#comment-33604</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/#comment-33604</guid>
		<description>With enemies like this, who needs friends?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With enemies like this, who needs friends?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/comment-page-1/#comment-33506</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/#comment-33506</guid>
		<description>The lies finally caught up with CBS, they are closing in on the brady bunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lies finally caught up with CBS, they are closing in on the brady bunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: countertop</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/comment-page-1/#comment-33505</link>
		<dc:creator>countertop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/11/01/more_on_machine_gun_sammy/#comment-33505</guid>
		<description>Looks like just one more reason to support the guy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like just one more reason to support the guy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
