Comments on: ATF lies again http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:33:21 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Tinkerty Tonk http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/comment-page-1/#comment-34983 Tinkerty Tonk Mon, 07 Nov 2005 10:45:25 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/#comment-34983 <strong>RINO sightings</strong> Get out your binoculars and focus: The RINOs have been sighted. RINO sightings

Get out your binoculars and focus: The RINOs have been sighted.

]]> By: Tyler D. http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/comment-page-1/#comment-34522 Tyler D. Sat, 05 Nov 2005 08:11:37 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/#comment-34522 When I become President I will disband the BATF. When I become President I will disband the BATF.

]]> By: Resistance is futile! http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/comment-page-1/#comment-34420 Resistance is futile! Sat, 05 Nov 2005 00:40:41 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/#comment-34420 <strong>Carnival of Cordite #37</strong> Welcome, readers, to our special 37th episode of the Carnival of Cordite! What's so special about 37? Well, it's probably just me... but I've really liked that number ever since Charlie Kerfeld, Houston Astros #37, asked for (and got!) $110,037.37, Carnival of Cordite #37

Welcome, readers, to our special 37th episode of the Carnival of Cordite! What’s so special about 37? Well, it’s probably just me… but I’ve really liked that number ever since Charlie Kerfeld, Houston Astros #37, asked for (and got!) $110,037.37,

]]> By: AnalogKid http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/comment-page-1/#comment-33410 AnalogKid Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:05:22 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/#comment-33410 Ha, you ain't seen nothin yet http://elfie.org/~croaker/wood.html Ha, you ain’t seen nothin yet

http://elfie.org/~croaker/wood.html

]]> By: Publicola http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/comment-page-1/#comment-33403 Publicola Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:44:40 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/#comment-33403 If the previous case you're talking about is the one the JPFO had a video of they did get the FAL in question to fire more than once with one trigger pull. The deal was though it's only do it with a certain brand of ammo (Winchester if I recall) which has a more sensitive primer than the others they tried. They only loaded two rounds per mag & tried 3 or 4 different types of ammo. Only the one brand of ammo would produce doubling. When they stripped the rifle afterwards (not the ATFU guy - the firearms consultant who was called in for the defense) they found all sorts of worn parts, including a return spring that was disintegrating as they picked it up. What was happening was that the firing pin was not being held back as the bolt closed & with the more sensitive primers this caused slam fires. Still the ATFU jack ass insisted that it was a machine gun rather than a rifle in need of repair. What really got me was this occured in Charlotte. I leave for a few years & the ATFU invades my home. Bastards. Every one. If the previous case you’re talking about is the one the JPFO had a video of they did get the FAL in question to fire more than once with one trigger pull.

The deal was though it’s only do it with a certain brand of ammo (Winchester if I recall) which has a more sensitive primer than the others they tried. They only loaded two rounds per mag & tried 3 or 4 different types of ammo. Only the one brand of ammo would produce doubling. When they stripped the rifle afterwards (not the ATFU guy – the firearms consultant who was called in for the defense) they found all sorts of worn parts, including a return spring that was disintegrating as they picked it up. What was happening was that the firing pin was not being held back as the bolt closed & with the more sensitive primers this caused slam fires. Still the ATFU jack ass insisted that it was a machine gun rather than a rifle in need of repair. What really got me was this occured in Charlotte. I leave for a few years & the ATFU invades my home. Bastards. Every one.

]]> By: Standard Mischief http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/comment-page-1/#comment-33385 Standard Mischief Mon, 31 Oct 2005 15:21:56 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/#comment-33385 At the risk of sounding like a broken record, why the heck hasn't our pro-gun prez executive-ordered a ATF smackdown? That's what executive orders are for. And what about our “pro-gun” congress critters? De-fund or de-authorize or do something. I heard for the first time an old Texan political saying when Bush 2 had his first inauguration. It was “dance with who you came with”. I think we have been left out in the cold here. Fscking repub-o-crats. At the risk of sounding like a broken record, why the heck hasn’t our pro-gun prez executive-ordered a ATF smackdown? That’s what executive orders are for. And what about our “pro-gun” congress critters? De-fund or de-authorize or do something.

I heard for the first time an old Texan political saying when Bush 2 had his first inauguration. It was “dance with who you came with”. I think we have been left out in the cold here.

Fscking repub-o-crats.

]]> By: Ravenwood http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/comment-page-1/#comment-33378 Ravenwood Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:48:29 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/10/31/atf_lies_again/#comment-33378 For registered machineguns, there are only three legal options. A registered gun (the sum of the parts), a registered receiver, and a registered sear. For unregistered machineguns they expand the definition to include any part from a machinegun, combined with it's semi-automatic variant. For instance if you own a semi-auto AR-15 and buy the bolt from an M-16 instead of an AR-15, that's considered possessing an unregistered machinegun. (assuming you don't also legally own an M-16) Even though the bolt is not enough to make the gun fire in full-auto, just possessing the M-16 part in conjunction with a semi-auto gun that can use it is considered owning a machinegun. For registered machineguns, there are only three legal options. A registered gun (the sum of the parts), a registered receiver, and a registered sear. For unregistered machineguns they expand the definition to include any part from a machinegun, combined with it’s semi-automatic variant.

For instance if you own a semi-auto AR-15 and buy the bolt from an M-16 instead of an AR-15, that’s considered possessing an unregistered machinegun. (assuming you don’t also legally own an M-16) Even though the bolt is not enough to make the gun fire in full-auto, just possessing the M-16 part in conjunction with a semi-auto gun that can use it is considered owning a machinegun.

]]>