Comments on: Today’s idiot: Tyler Eison

By: anti stupidity

anti stupidity — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:09:32 +0000

damn that is a situation that this guy is going to take to heart . i mean he
was going to be killed but he let his dog deal with the problem . but in the
end it should be illegal to have a dog to protect you . dogs were not intended
to be weapons . fight your own battles . don’t have a dog to protect your family .
it is just not right .

By: Jairi ...

Jairi ... — Thu, 25 Aug 2005 02:52:32 +0000

When I first read this article… I immediatly began the search for information on how to contact this man! What he is doing is beyond illegal and immorally WRONG. I have loved, rescued, trained, and been owned by pit bulls for as long as I can remember, and reading this PISSES ME OFF. This guy is abusing the crap out of these dogs to make them mean… Why hasn’t AC done something?

-Jairi
asianpitbull@hotmail.com

By: Steve Ramsey

Steve Ramsey — Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:07:10 +0000

Humans have rights.
They also have records of behaivior (criminal).
Felons can’t own guns.

Guns are not autonomous. Guns cannot hop down the street and shoot someone. Guns are not indiscriminate.

Guns have the most advanced guidance system known, the human brain.

These dogs bred and abused into indiscrimate violent behaivior are the equivalent of a V-1 buzz bomb Vs A cruise missile.
1 is a weapon of terror, the other is a precision guided munition for point target application.

This guy isn’t simply an animal abuser, he’s creating deadly weapons which even he cannot control, nor wishes to.

On the libertarian VS anarchist issue, I stand by my descriptor.
They both blur the definition of freedom VS Liberty.

By: CharlesH

CharlesH — Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:02:16 +0000

Seems like current animal cruelty laws should be applicable.

Metulj, are you honestly confusing libertarian with anarchist, or are you saying stuff you know is stupid to try to get a rise out of people?
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/warriorshtm/enfantprovocateur.htm

By: Metulj

Metulj — Wed, 24 Aug 2005 01:03:41 +0000

“As far as laws go, yes, I WILL advocate one that would prevent morons like this from abusing dogs into becoming violent ego extentions”

But what about laws that prevent morons like this owning guns as extentions of their violent egos?

By: Steve Ramsey

Steve Ramsey — Tue, 23 Aug 2005 18:31:30 +0000

A professional protection dog trainer would gasp.

This guy is NOT creating dogs for protection.
He is creating MONSTERS. He is essentially making psychopaths out of them. Totally uncontrolled ones at that.

And the techniques for creating such monsters is cruel and inhumane, much like this bastard who “used to” fight dogs.

As far as laws go, yes, I WILL advocate one that would prevent morons like this from abusing dogs into becoming violent ego extentions.

By: Metulj

Metulj — Tue, 23 Aug 2005 18:09:15 +0000

Always wiggle room with you? Do you like lukewarm baths as well?

By: SayUncle

SayUncle — Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:53:48 +0000

Did I advocate passing a law? I’ve never claimed to be Libertarian, but libertarian-leaning.

By: Metulj

Metulj — Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:50:08 +0000

Sputter. Sputter. Sputter. Ok, I’ve recovered. So you are saying you’d take away that man’s freedom to raise his dogs the way he wants to? Not very Libertarian* of you. You should just go to his place with your gun and if one of those dogs jumps you could kill it! Now that’s freedom.

*Freedom: for those you can afford it.