<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homeless in New Hampshire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/25/homeless_in_new_hampshire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/25/homeless_in_new_hampshire/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/25/homeless_in_new_hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-17646</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 07:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6092#comment-17646</guid>
		<description>Good point, Manish.  The real problem is that either proposal can be easily distinguished on the grounds that it targets Souter specifically, rather than just &quot;happening&quot; to land on his property while carrying out some oh-so-important governmental purpose.  That&#039;s why someone needs to try the same kind of stunt somewhere in the Ninth Circuit, the one circuit where there&#039;s a plethora of judges ready to reverse the Supreme Court by taking its own precedents to silly extremes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Manish.  The real problem is that either proposal can be easily distinguished on the grounds that it targets Souter specifically, rather than just &#8220;happening&#8221; to land on his property while carrying out some oh-so-important governmental purpose.  That&#8217;s why someone needs to try the same kind of stunt somewhere in the Ninth Circuit, the one circuit where there&#8217;s a plethora of judges ready to reverse the Supreme Court by taking its own precedents to silly extremes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/25/homeless_in_new_hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-17359</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6092#comment-17359</guid>
		<description>A hotel would be more appropriate since a park would fall completely within what the founders intended eminent domain to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A hotel would be more appropriate since a park would fall completely within what the founders intended eminent domain to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cube</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/25/homeless_in_new_hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-17358</link>
		<dc:creator>cube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6092#comment-17358</guid>
		<description>&quot;A rival proposal from townspeople would turn Souter’s land into a park commemorating the U.S. Constitution.&quot;

You know that stands a greater chace of getting though all the leagalites than the Hotel idea, but I still like the hotel idea better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A rival proposal from townspeople would turn Souter’s land into a park commemorating the U.S. Constitution.&#8221;</p>
<p>You know that stands a greater chace of getting though all the leagalites than the Hotel idea, but I still like the hotel idea better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

