<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compromise or sacrifice?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/15/compromise_or_sacrifice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/15/compromise_or_sacrifice/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:00:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: countertop</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/15/compromise_or_sacrifice/comment-page-1/#comment-17194</link>
		<dc:creator>countertop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 16:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6012#comment-17194</guid>
		<description>My understanding (from someone here on the hill) is that the Feinstein amendment is different than the language in her actual bill and will only require .50 Cal. sales to go through FFLs who run a background check.

If so, I probably don&#039;t care about it too much as an extra $20 on top of a $5000 gun purchase is pretty minimal. However, I am going to reserve judgment until I see the actual amendment language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding (from someone here on the hill) is that the Feinstein amendment is different than the language in her actual bill and will only require .50 Cal. sales to go through FFLs who run a background check.</p>
<p>If so, I probably don&#8217;t care about it too much as an extra $20 on top of a $5000 gun purchase is pretty minimal. However, I am going to reserve judgment until I see the actual amendment language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle :  60 Minutes lies yet again</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/15/compromise_or_sacrifice/comment-page-1/#comment-17207</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle :  60 Minutes lies yet again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=6012#comment-17207</guid>
		<description>[...] ernational impact of this band of unprosecuted criminals.  	It&#8217;s also timed with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/07/15/compromise_or_sacrifice/&quot;&gt;50 caliber ban being potentially offered up as the sacrificial lamb&lt;/a&gt; to appe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ernational impact of this band of unprosecuted criminals.  	It&#8217;s also timed with the <a href="http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/07/15/compromise_or_sacrifice/">50 caliber ban being potentially offered up as the sacrificial lamb</a> to appe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
