<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prediction time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/05/prediction_time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/05/prediction_time/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:48:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Political Scandals</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/05/prediction_time/comment-page-1/#comment-31408</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Political Scandals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5929#comment-31408</guid>
		<description>[...] Speaking of scandals: On the Plame case, I still stand by my original prediction: Rove is, once again, poking liberals and the media with a pointy stick. When it’s all said and done, the media and those on the left hollering will, once again, look like imbeciles and be forced to kind of acknowledge a little oops. Rove will light up a cigar, have a drink, and giggle like a school girl. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speaking of scandals: On the Plame case, I still stand by my original prediction: Rove is, once again, poking liberals and the media with a pointy stick. When it’s all said and done, the media and those on the left hollering will, once again, look like imbeciles and be forced to kind of acknowledge a little oops. Rove will light up a cigar, have a drink, and giggle like a school girl. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smijer</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/05/prediction_time/comment-page-1/#comment-16979</link>
		<dc:creator>smijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 22:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5929#comment-16979</guid>
		<description>What if a whistleblower has to reveal classified info to blow the whistle?  That&#039;s a crime, too - shouldn&#039;t a journalist be able to protect the source?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if a whistleblower has to reveal classified info to blow the whistle?  That&#8217;s a crime, too &#8211; shouldn&#8217;t a journalist be able to protect the source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/05/prediction_time/comment-page-1/#comment-16968</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5929#comment-16968</guid>
		<description>If i&#039;ve learned one thing, it&#039;s don&#039;t argue semantics with xrlq.  Still, per my dictionary, not all defintions of &#039;crime&#039; require a punishment (though one does).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i&#8217;ve learned one thing, it&#8217;s don&#8217;t argue semantics with xrlq.  Still, per my dictionary, not all defintions of &#8216;crime&#8217; require a punishment (though one does).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/05/prediction_time/comment-page-1/#comment-16961</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5929#comment-16961</guid>
		<description>Whether one chooses to call CNN&#039;s acts a non-crime (which it is) or as a &quot;crime that is not punishable&quot; (an oxymoron) is beside the point.  &quot;Crime&quot; or no, if there is no punishment possible, there&#039;s no reason to arrest the perp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether one chooses to call CNN&#8217;s acts a non-crime (which it is) or as a &#8220;crime that is not punishable&#8221; (an oxymoron) is beside the point.  &#8220;Crime&#8221; or no, if there is no punishment possible, there&#8217;s no reason to arrest the perp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/05/prediction_time/comment-page-1/#comment-16952</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5929#comment-16952</guid>
		<description>I contend there was a &#039;crime&#039; but the &#039;crime&#039; was not punishable since it was not willfull.  I need to forget a bunch of gun laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I contend there was a &#8216;crime&#8217; but the &#8216;crime&#8217; was not punishable since it was not willfull.  I need to forget a bunch of gun laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/05/prediction_time/comment-page-1/#comment-16950</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 14:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5929#comment-16950</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://xrlq.com/2005/02/24/ignorance-of-the-law-is-no-excuse-i-never-heard-that-one-have-you/&quot;&gt;There was no crime&lt;/a&gt; in CNN&#039;s case.  There is here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://xrlq.com/2005/02/24/ignorance-of-the-law-is-no-excuse-i-never-heard-that-one-have-you/">There was no crime</a> in CNN&#8217;s case.  There is here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/05/prediction_time/comment-page-1/#comment-16949</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5929#comment-16949</guid>
		<description>Depends.  It seems that in this case, the reporter knew of someone breaking the law.  But then again i&#039;m still waiting for CNN reporters to be arrested for breaking the law when they illegally transferred a rifle across state lines to do a gun scare story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends.  It seems that in this case, the reporter knew of someone breaking the law.  But then again i&#8217;m still waiting for CNN reporters to be arrested for breaking the law when they illegally transferred a rifle across state lines to do a gun scare story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smijer</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/05/prediction_time/comment-page-1/#comment-16946</link>
		<dc:creator>smijer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 03:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5929#comment-16946</guid>
		<description>I hope you are wrong, but I suspect you may be right....

I&#039;m still trying to sort out where I stand on the court decisions to allow prosecution of the journalists for not revealing their sources.  On the one hand, I hate to see the priviledge abused, on the other hand, I hate to see the priviledge eroded.  Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you are wrong, but I suspect you may be right&#8230;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still trying to sort out where I stand on the court decisions to allow prosecution of the journalists for not revealing their sources.  On the one hand, I hate to see the priviledge abused, on the other hand, I hate to see the priviledge eroded.  Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

