http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/01/more_gun_lies_in_the_la_times/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:33:21 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/01/more_gun_lies_in_the_la_times/comment-page-1/#comment-16899 SayUncle Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:24:27 +0000 /?p=5908#comment-16899 I concur. But this ain't a post about that. I concur. But this ain’t a post about that.

]]> http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/07/01/more_gun_lies_in_the_la_times/comment-page-1/#comment-16898 Xrlq Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:21:03 +0000 /?p=5908#comment-16898 Lambert is right, to a point: three months of data showing a small decrease in crime is probably not enough to justify any conclusion that the sunset of the AW ban has prevented any crimes. However, three months is plenty of data to show that the AW ban supporters were full of crap. If their nightmarish predictions had a kernel of truth, that same three month period would show a large spike in crime that simply isn't there. Lambert is right, to a point: three months of data showing a small decrease in crime is probably not enough to justify any conclusion that the sunset of the AW ban has prevented any crimes. However, three months is plenty of data to show that the AW ban supporters were full of crap. If their nightmarish predictions had a kernel of truth, that same three month period would show a large spike in crime that simply isn’t there.

]]>