<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excellent!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/06/29/excellent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/06/29/excellent/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:09:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/06/29/excellent/comment-page-1/#comment-16840</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5893#comment-16840</guid>
		<description>I came up with a one-two punch scenario that might actually work.  A more likely solution would be for one or two states to pass tough eminent domain reform laws, then get the issue back before the Supreme Court, where Justice Kennedy will then rule that the Constitution has once again amended itself by an &quot;emerging consensus,&quot; only this time in a direction that actually has something to do with the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came up with a one-two punch scenario that might actually work.  A more likely solution would be for one or two states to pass tough eminent domain reform laws, then get the issue back before the Supreme Court, where Justice Kennedy will then rule that the Constitution has once again amended itself by an &#8220;emerging consensus,&#8221; only this time in a direction that actually has something to do with the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
