<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re winning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/05/16/were_winning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/05/16/were_winning/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:57:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ravenwood</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/05/16/were_winning/comment-page-1/#comment-15624</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravenwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 17:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5551#comment-15624</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;One [amendment], which passed unanimously, would make it a misdemeanor for a registered sex offender to carry a pistol.&lt;/i&gt;

This is not only useless, but flouts the Fifth Amendment by compelling registered sex offenders to register their illegal gun carrying.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;I&#039;m deeply troubled that the majority of the Senate ignored the rights of religious institutions,&quot; said Lillehaug. &quot;Apparently some of them thought the Second Amendment was more important than the First Amendment.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

It is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>One [amendment], which passed unanimously, would make it a misdemeanor for a registered sex offender to carry a pistol.</i></p>
<p>This is not only useless, but flouts the Fifth Amendment by compelling registered sex offenders to register their illegal gun carrying.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;I&#8217;m deeply troubled that the majority of the Senate ignored the rights of religious institutions,&#8221; said Lillehaug. &#8220;Apparently some of them thought the Second Amendment was more important than the First Amendment.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>It is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
