<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More tax breaks for the wealthy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/04/26/more_tax_breaks_for_the_wealthy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/04/26/more_tax_breaks_for_the_wealthy/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:55:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/04/26/more_tax_breaks_for_the_wealthy/comment-page-1/#comment-15253</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 12:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5387#comment-15253</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re missing the operative line, which is that (in an unprecedented move) the investigation was move and then quashed.  No, I don&#039;t like the fact they wasted $21M on a blue dress or any of that other witchhunt crap but when someone is granted political favors that place them above the law, that chaps my ass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re missing the operative line, which is that (in an unprecedented move) the investigation was move and then quashed.  No, I don&#8217;t like the fact they wasted $21M on a blue dress or any of that other witchhunt crap but when someone is granted political favors that place them above the law, that chaps my ass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gammarock</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/04/26/more_tax_breaks_for_the_wealthy/comment-page-1/#comment-15252</link>
		<dc:creator>gammarock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5387#comment-15252</guid>
		<description>WTF ? What does having an Independent Counsel investigating Cisneros have to do with tax evasion ? EVEN IF there was smoke where there was fire, why isn&#039;t the IRS going after Cisneros ? 

And with a 55 - 44 - majority in the Senate, how in the HELL can 2 of those 44 Democratic Senators squash a report, which the Wall Street Onlinejournal implies possible wrong doing ?

This crap went on non-stop from 1993-2001 {Funny, the years Clinton was serving as President} and I think is ridiculous that people are concerned about what Cisneros may or may not have paid taxes on payments to his mistress but those same people show no concern over the 21+ million spent on the investigation. 

How about a compromise ? Why not have   Barrett turn over his findings to the IRS and have THEM deal with it ? 

I could careless about whether &quot;a guy gets off scott-free for tax evasion&quot; because it happens every freaking day but it seems that Democrats and regular smucks are the only ones that have to abide by the so called &quot;rule of law&quot;. 

And if they are associated with the Clintons, you really have to go after them and the Wall Street Journal, along with the rest of the right leaning media has made a sport of that. 

It is crystal clear to me. What does David Barrett have ? Seems like he should have SOMETHING solid after spending 21+ million dollars.

And I will even go out on a limb and say that if they accepted a GUILTY plea that he understated what he thought he was paying his mistress by mistake, how would THAT be a willfull act of tax evasion ?

I could be totally wrong and I don&#039;t condone anything Cisneros did but what really chaps my hide is always these stupid headline like &quot;An IRS cover-up ?&quot;

Then an entire OPINION PIECE with no evidence of wrong doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF ? What does having an Independent Counsel investigating Cisneros have to do with tax evasion ? EVEN IF there was smoke where there was fire, why isn&#8217;t the IRS going after Cisneros ? </p>
<p>And with a 55 &#8211; 44 &#8211; majority in the Senate, how in the HELL can 2 of those 44 Democratic Senators squash a report, which the Wall Street Onlinejournal implies possible wrong doing ?</p>
<p>This crap went on non-stop from 1993-2001 {Funny, the years Clinton was serving as President} and I think is ridiculous that people are concerned about what Cisneros may or may not have paid taxes on payments to his mistress but those same people show no concern over the 21+ million spent on the investigation. </p>
<p>How about a compromise ? Why not have   Barrett turn over his findings to the IRS and have THEM deal with it ? </p>
<p>I could careless about whether &#8220;a guy gets off scott-free for tax evasion&#8221; because it happens every freaking day but it seems that Democrats and regular smucks are the only ones that have to abide by the so called &#8220;rule of law&#8221;. </p>
<p>And if they are associated with the Clintons, you really have to go after them and the Wall Street Journal, along with the rest of the right leaning media has made a sport of that. </p>
<p>It is crystal clear to me. What does David Barrett have ? Seems like he should have SOMETHING solid after spending 21+ million dollars.</p>
<p>And I will even go out on a limb and say that if they accepted a GUILTY plea that he understated what he thought he was paying his mistress by mistake, how would THAT be a willfull act of tax evasion ?</p>
<p>I could be totally wrong and I don&#8217;t condone anything Cisneros did but what really chaps my hide is always these stupid headline like &#8220;An IRS cover-up ?&#8221;</p>
<p>Then an entire OPINION PIECE with no evidence of wrong doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/04/26/more_tax_breaks_for_the_wealthy/comment-page-1/#comment-15227</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5387#comment-15227</guid>
		<description>So, what does that have to do with letting some guy off scott-free for tax evasion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, what does that have to do with letting some guy off scott-free for tax evasion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gammarock</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/04/26/more_tax_breaks_for_the_wealthy/comment-page-1/#comment-15226</link>
		<dc:creator>gammarock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 08:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5387#comment-15226</guid>
		<description>If only we had an independent counsel to investigate no WMD in Iraq, No bid Halliburton contracts, Plame-gate, passing classified documents to Isreal, &quot;video news releases&quot; passed off as news, withheld EPA reports concerning air quality in New York City post September 11th, the Niger yellowcake forgeries, Abu Ghraib ... forget all that stuff. 

What REALLY is important is that Cisneros said he paid a mistress (public record) 2500 dollars a month when it was actually more and he pled GUILTY.

Yeah, lets keep spending 2 million a year trying to find some dirt on the Clintons.

Funny how the right wing had to make up murder lists while this Administation simple creates it own with real people dying. 

Yes, I would say uncle to make it all stop but with the like of Ann Coulter on the cover of Time magazine, clearly we see America&#039;s bests days have past us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only we had an independent counsel to investigate no WMD in Iraq, No bid Halliburton contracts, Plame-gate, passing classified documents to Isreal, &#8220;video news releases&#8221; passed off as news, withheld EPA reports concerning air quality in New York City post September 11th, the Niger yellowcake forgeries, Abu Ghraib &#8230; forget all that stuff. </p>
<p>What REALLY is important is that Cisneros said he paid a mistress (public record) 2500 dollars a month when it was actually more and he pled GUILTY.</p>
<p>Yeah, lets keep spending 2 million a year trying to find some dirt on the Clintons.</p>
<p>Funny how the right wing had to make up murder lists while this Administation simple creates it own with real people dying. </p>
<p>Yes, I would say uncle to make it all stop but with the like of Ann Coulter on the cover of Time magazine, clearly we see America&#8217;s bests days have past us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle :  Senate Staffers Reading Blogs?</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/04/26/more_tax_breaks_for_the_wealthy/comment-page-1/#comment-15259</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle :  Senate Staffers Reading Blogs?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=5387#comment-15259</guid>
		<description>[...] a name=&quot;5417&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt; 	Senate Staffers Reading Blogs? &#124;By SayUncle&#124;  	I posted a link the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/04/26/more_tax_breaks_for_the_wealthy/&quot;&gt;WSJ piece&lt;/a&gt; on killing the investigation of Cisneros.  Today, I recei [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a name=&#8221;5417&#8243;><br />
 	Senate Staffers Reading Blogs?<br />
 |By SayUncle|</p>
<p> 	I posted a link the <a href="http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2005/04/26/more_tax_breaks_for_the_wealthy/">WSJ piece</a> on killing the investigation of Cisneros.  Today, I recei [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
