<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN Rifle Felony Update 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/02/23/cnn_rifle_felony_update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/02/23/cnn_rifle_felony_update/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:57:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/02/23/cnn_rifle_felony_update/comment-page-1/#comment-14104</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4920#comment-14104</guid>
		<description>Yeah, i just realized it&#039;d do that.  Kinda neat because you can have separate posts as updates on the same date that will show up.  HOwever, i didn&#039;t do it on purpose this time so i may change it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, i just realized it&#8217;d do that.  Kinda neat because you can have separate posts as updates on the same date that will show up.  HOwever, i didn&#8217;t do it on purpose this time so i may change it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/02/23/cnn_rifle_felony_update/comment-page-1/#comment-14102</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4920#comment-14102</guid>
		<description>Did you know that this entry (#4920) shares a Permalink with another (#4917)?  That&#039;s why I have WP set up to include unique post ID as part of the URI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that this entry (#4920) shares a Permalink with another (#4917)?  That&#8217;s why I have WP set up to include unique post ID as part of the URI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/02/23/cnn_rifle_felony_update/comment-page-1/#comment-14093</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4920#comment-14093</guid>
		<description>I concur but still want to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur but still want to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/02/23/cnn_rifle_felony_update/comment-page-1/#comment-14092</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4920#comment-14092</guid>
		<description>I guess it all hinges on who the &quot;we&quot; is in &quot;we flew home.&quot;  If he actually meant &quot;Mr. Straw and I flew to my home state,&quot; that&#039;s fine.  If he actually meant &quot;Mr. Straw gave/sold/lent me his gun and I flew home with other people from CNN,&quot; it&#039;s not.  A loan from Mr. Straw to Mr. Griffin would be acceptable, but Griffin taking the borrowed gun to his home state would not be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it all hinges on who the &#8220;we&#8221; is in &#8220;we flew home.&#8221;  If he actually meant &#8220;Mr. Straw and I flew to my home state,&#8221; that&#8217;s fine.  If he actually meant &#8220;Mr. Straw gave/sold/lent me his gun and I flew home with other people from CNN,&#8221; it&#8217;s not.  A loan from Mr. Straw to Mr. Griffin would be acceptable, but Griffin taking the borrowed gun to his home state would not be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jed</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/02/23/cnn_rifle_felony_update/comment-page-1/#comment-14079</link>
		<dc:creator>jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 05:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4920#comment-14079</guid>
		<description>Oh, gotta add that Kevin&#039;s conclusion is based on a point made by a TFL commenter who zeroed in on one portion of the transcript. The rest of the transcript still stands as incriminating in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, gotta add that Kevin&#8217;s conclusion is based on a point made by a TFL commenter who zeroed in on one portion of the transcript. The rest of the transcript still stands as incriminating in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jed</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/02/23/cnn_rifle_felony_update/comment-page-1/#comment-14078</link>
		<dc:creator>jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 05:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4920#comment-14078</guid>
		<description>Counterop, legally, there is no &quot;straw purchaser&quot; in a private sale.

But, if the intermediary transferred the gun to Griffin (the CNN reporter) subsequent to his buying it  from the original Texas seller, then doesn&#039;t he then become the guilty seller (in the eyes of GCA&#039;68) himself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Counterop, legally, there is no &#8220;straw purchaser&#8221; in a private sale.</p>
<p>But, if the intermediary transferred the gun to Griffin (the CNN reporter) subsequent to his buying it  from the original Texas seller, then doesn&#8217;t he then become the guilty seller (in the eyes of GCA&#8217;68) himself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: countertop</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2005/02/23/cnn_rifle_felony_update/comment-page-1/#comment-14077</link>
		<dc:creator>countertop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2005 04:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4920#comment-14077</guid>
		<description>The buyer would only be in the clear if he bought the gun for himself with his own funds.  If CNN gave him the cash and he bought it for the reporter (who then took it back to Georgia) wouldn&#039;t he be a straw purchaser and/or part of the conspiracy??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The buyer would only be in the clear if he bought the gun for himself with his own funds.  If CNN gave him the cash and he bought it for the reporter (who then took it back to Georgia) wouldn&#8217;t he be a straw purchaser and/or part of the conspiracy??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
