<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The War On Gun Shows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/10/05/the_war_on_gun_shows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/10/05/the_war_on_gun_shows/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:45:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/10/05/the_war_on_gun_shows/comment-page-1/#comment-9255</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 20:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3875#comment-9255</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a mystery: A day has passed since this Supreme Court decision that went against gunowners, and NO anti-gunowner group has issued a press release to crow about it!

What&#039;s going on?

The explanation: This news story is a double-edged sword.

While anti-gunowner groups are no doubt pleased by the go-ahead to ban gun shows, the most immediate item on their agenda is background checks to &quot;close the gun show loophole.&quot; To do this, they have spread the deceit that they ONLY want background checks at gun shows, not gun show BANS.

California however ALREADY HAS background checks to &quot;close the gun show loophole,&quot; and has (with the quiet and sometimes not-so-quiet support of anti-gunowner groups) moved on to the next phase: gun show BANS.

If anti-gunowner groups were to make their usual fuss over this Supreme Court decision, it would serve to call attention to their desire for gun show BANS, at a time when it is still important that they continue the deceit that they ONLY want background checks to &quot;close the gun show loophole.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a mystery: A day has passed since this Supreme Court decision that went against gunowners, and NO anti-gunowner group has issued a press release to crow about it!</p>
<p>What&#8217;s going on?</p>
<p>The explanation: This news story is a double-edged sword.</p>
<p>While anti-gunowner groups are no doubt pleased by the go-ahead to ban gun shows, the most immediate item on their agenda is background checks to &#8220;close the gun show loophole.&#8221; To do this, they have spread the deceit that they ONLY want background checks at gun shows, not gun show BANS.</p>
<p>California however ALREADY HAS background checks to &#8220;close the gun show loophole,&#8221; and has (with the quiet and sometimes not-so-quiet support of anti-gunowner groups) moved on to the next phase: gun show BANS.</p>
<p>If anti-gunowner groups were to make their usual fuss over this Supreme Court decision, it would serve to call attention to their desire for gun show BANS, at a time when it is still important that they continue the deceit that they ONLY want background checks to &#8220;close the gun show loophole.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

