<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Still wrong but better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/07/16/still_wrong_but_better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/07/16/still_wrong_but_better/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:00:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/07/16/still_wrong_but_better/comment-page-1/#comment-7544</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 21:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3260#comment-7544</guid>
		<description>Pits are good cattle dogs and hog dogs too.  They will catch and hold either.  People use them to hunt feral pigs.

I like them because they&#039;re just darn friendly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pits are good cattle dogs and hog dogs too.  They will catch and hold either.  People use them to hunt feral pigs.</p>
<p>I like them because they&#8217;re just darn friendly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/07/16/still_wrong_but_better/comment-page-1/#comment-7539</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3260#comment-7539</guid>
		<description>Yes, it&#039;s the owners, not the dog. In the case of pit bulls, it seems like the average owner is a criminal and/or idiot who wants a &quot;dangerous&quot; dog, but isn&#039;t likely to put in the time and effort required to properly train a guard dog - because if they were, they&#039;d have done a little research and realized that a number of other breeds are far better suited for most guard dog duties. (Starting with the physique - the pitty&#039;s special adaptations to dog fighting are no advantage at all against a biped. Now, if you want to guard your sausage shop against stray dogs, a well trained pitty might be just the thing.)

Or is there some other reason someone would want a pit bull? This is a serious question; I&#039;ve no experience with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it&#8217;s the owners, not the dog. In the case of pit bulls, it seems like the average owner is a criminal and/or idiot who wants a &#8220;dangerous&#8221; dog, but isn&#8217;t likely to put in the time and effort required to properly train a guard dog &#8211; because if they were, they&#8217;d have done a little research and realized that a number of other breeds are far better suited for most guard dog duties. (Starting with the physique &#8211; the pitty&#8217;s special adaptations to dog fighting are no advantage at all against a biped. Now, if you want to guard your sausage shop against stray dogs, a well trained pitty might be just the thing.)</p>
<p>Or is there some other reason someone would want a pit bull? This is a serious question; I&#8217;ve no experience with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damnum absque injuria</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/07/16/still_wrong_but_better/comment-page-1/#comment-7504</link>
		<dc:creator>damnum absque injuria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 19:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3260#comment-7504</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More P.B.S. from C.W.N.&lt;/strong&gt;
I was going to blog about this idiot (‘Hat tip: Uncleequally ignorant screed went unread.



I don&#039;t believe your 6% figure for a minute, and judging by your own characterization of that number as &quot;if anything, conservative&quot; (i.e., low) appare...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More P.B.S. from C.W.N.</strong><br />
I was going to blog about this idiot (‘Hat tip: Uncleequally ignorant screed went unread.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe your 6% figure for a minute, and judging by your own characterization of that number as &#8220;if anything, conservative&#8221; (i.e., low) appare&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/07/16/still_wrong_but_better/comment-page-1/#comment-7497</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2004 17:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3260#comment-7497</guid>
		<description>1. Note how comparing anyone to gun advocates is supposed to automatically make them wrong.  Frisco&#039;s bad in that way, and the media is worse, so I guess it figures that the Frisco media is as bad as it gets.

2. Last week, pit bulls accounted for &quot;every other&quot; dog in the East Bay shelter.  Now they&#039;re down to 6% of the canine population.  And we&#039;re supposed to respect that figure because it&#039;s a &quot;conservative&quot; (i.e., probably too low) estimate. Huh?

3. My favorite part was this idiot&#039;s claim that pit bulls have a &quot;low tolerance for pain.&quot;  Pits are known, of course, for their &lt;i&gt;high&lt;/i&gt; tolerance of pain, which is why two of them go on fighting in the pit long after one of them should have conceded the fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Note how comparing anyone to gun advocates is supposed to automatically make them wrong.  Frisco&#8217;s bad in that way, and the media is worse, so I guess it figures that the Frisco media is as bad as it gets.</p>
<p>2. Last week, pit bulls accounted for &#8220;every other&#8221; dog in the East Bay shelter.  Now they&#8217;re down to 6% of the canine population.  And we&#8217;re supposed to respect that figure because it&#8217;s a &#8220;conservative&#8221; (i.e., probably too low) estimate. Huh?</p>
<p>3. My favorite part was this idiot&#8217;s claim that pit bulls have a &#8220;low tolerance for pain.&#8221;  Pits are known, of course, for their <i>high</i> tolerance of pain, which is why two of them go on fighting in the pit long after one of them should have conceded the fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
