<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Background Checks for Dog Owners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/28/background_checks_for_dog_owners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/28/background_checks_for_dog_owners/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:08:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tarazet</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/28/background_checks_for_dog_owners/comment-page-1/#comment-7156</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarazet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3146#comment-7156</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Special License For Pit Bulls?&lt;/strong&gt;
My buddy Say Uncle has the details about a proposed bill in N.J....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Special License For Pit Bulls?</strong><br />
My buddy Say Uncle has the details about a proposed bill in N.J&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mostly cajun</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/28/background_checks_for_dog_owners/comment-page-1/#comment-7104</link>
		<dc:creator>mostly cajun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3146#comment-7104</guid>
		<description>But you&#039;re missing the big up-side to this bill.  Think of all the new people who will have to be put on the ogvernment payroll to inspect leashes, identify dogs and such.  And the contractors who must be hired to present training seminars on dog identification and proper testing of leashes for approval.  We could double government payrolls.  And they&#039;d ALL vote dimmocrat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you&#8217;re missing the big up-side to this bill.  Think of all the new people who will have to be put on the ogvernment payroll to inspect leashes, identify dogs and such.  And the contractors who must be hired to present training seminars on dog identification and proper testing of leashes for approval.  We could double government payrolls.  And they&#8217;d ALL vote dimmocrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
