<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So, you found the site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:46:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/comment-page-1/#comment-6777</link>
		<dc:creator>glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3077#comment-6777</guid>
		<description>Just so you know, the difference between the MT and PHP solution is in their approaches to scale.   MT generates static documents that take very little effort for the web server to deliver.  This means that it spends all of the time building your site up-front, when a change is made.   Wordpress doesn&#039;t spend any time up-front.  Instead it builds the pages on demand.  I&#039;m not familiar with Wordpress&#039; caching strategy, but what this  amounts to is that the 45 minutes of assembly time you see now is spread out over the requests.  The upside is that changes are immediate.  The downside is that if you get significant traffic, the web server might not be able to keep up with requests while it reassembles pages for each page hit.

The good news is that most of your content is probably infrequently accessed, while only the top 10 or so draw all of the attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you know, the difference between the MT and PHP solution is in their approaches to scale.   MT generates static documents that take very little effort for the web server to deliver.  This means that it spends all of the time building your site up-front, when a change is made.   Wordpress doesn&#8217;t spend any time up-front.  Instead it builds the pages on demand.  I&#8217;m not familiar with Wordpress&#8217; caching strategy, but what this  amounts to is that the 45 minutes of assembly time you see now is spread out over the requests.  The upside is that changes are immediate.  The downside is that if you get significant traffic, the web server might not be able to keep up with requests while it reassembles pages for each page hit.</p>
<p>The good news is that most of your content is probably infrequently accessed, while only the top 10 or so draw all of the attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On The Third Hand</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/comment-page-1/#comment-6770</link>
		<dc:creator>On The Third Hand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3077#comment-6770</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Another moved to Word Press&lt;/strong&gt;
Says Uncle, with some help from yours truly, has moved from MT to Wordpress.  Seems he got a bit tired of 45 minute rebuilds. Can&#039;t say I blame him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Another moved to Word Press</strong><br />
Says Uncle, with some help from yours truly, has moved from MT to Wordpress.  Seems he got a bit tired of 45 minute rebuilds. Can&#8217;t say I blame him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skb</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/comment-page-1/#comment-6768</link>
		<dc:creator>skb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3077#comment-6768</guid>
		<description>Oh, comments work a lot faster, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, comments work a lot faster, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skb</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/comment-page-1/#comment-6767</link>
		<dc:creator>skb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3077#comment-6767</guid>
		<description>Nice. Transparent conversion, too. Just how it should work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. Transparent conversion, too. Just how it should work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy K</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/comment-page-1/#comment-6761</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3077#comment-6761</guid>
		<description>No updating necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No updating necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/comment-page-1/#comment-6760</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 02:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3077#comment-6760</guid>
		<description>Nah.  Gonna move this to the old url.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah.  Gonna move this to the old url.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jed</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/comment-page-1/#comment-6759</link>
		<dc:creator>jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 02:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3077#comment-6759</guid>
		<description>So, do we officially update our bookmarks and blogrolls yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, do we officially update our bookmarks and blogrolls yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/comment-page-1/#comment-6756</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3077#comment-6756</guid>
		<description>Testing for new pop up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testing for new pop up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/comment-page-1/#comment-6755</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3077#comment-6755</guid>
		<description>Ah, the templates all have target = _blank.  GOod catch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the templates all have target = _blank.  GOod catch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jed</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/comment-page-1/#comment-6754</link>
		<dc:creator>jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3077#comment-6754</guid>
		<description>And, the &quot;say it&quot; button openned another browser window. Uneccessary, don&#039;cha think? (But then I always hate it when somebody decides to open something in a new browser window.) Still.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, the &#8220;say it&#8221; button openned another browser window. Uneccessary, don&#8217;cha think? (But then I always hate it when somebody decides to open something in a new browser window.) Still.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jed</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2004/06/16/so_you_found_the_site/comment-page-1/#comment-6753</link>
		<dc:creator>jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 01:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=3077#comment-6753</guid>
		<description>Well, since you made it so easy to find. I sometimes contemplate switching to WordPress -- just don&#039;t want to do the work yet. But yeah, the advantages to having a completely database driven site are many.

Only glitch so far (which is at your old site too) is that it&#039;s wider than my browser window. Probably a stylesheet definition specifying something using an absolute pixel width.

I&#039;ll reference something ... see if pingbacks work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since you made it so easy to find. I sometimes contemplate switching to WordPress &#8212; just don&#8217;t want to do the work yet. But yeah, the advantages to having a completely database driven site are many.</p>
<p>Only glitch so far (which is at your old site too) is that it&#8217;s wider than my browser window. Probably a stylesheet definition specifying something using an absolute pixel width.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll reference something &#8230; see if pingbacks work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
